Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter
Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Gronodonthegreat

Member
  • Content Count

    6
  • Avg. Content Per Day

    0
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Gronodonthegreat

  • Birthday 09/06/1997

Other Information

  • Member Title
    Your KH theory is unlikely
  • Gender
    Male
  1. I've played the first and second one, chain of memories, re:coded, 358/2, birth by sleep, and unchained x. I'm still currently waiting to catch up in unchained x and beat 358/2, waiting on DDD, 0.2, and back cover on the 2.8 collection to finally get caught up for III
  2. Hey, I'm a trombone player too! Probably for me it would be this (it is impromptu, so it'll probably change a little bit if I listen to the music from the games again): 5. Exploration theme for Deep Jungle 4. The 13th Struggle 3. Roxas' Theme 2. Kairi's theme (the music box one) 1. Rage Awakened (Lingering Will Boss Theme)
  3. I like to imagine that the "traitor" to The Master is Xehanort, and Xehanort actually isn't following anyone's wishes using the Goatblade. As for your theory, I just don't want another "villain revealed" plot point at the end of this last Kingdom Hearts game, I just want a reliable end-goal villain for the final chapter of this story, you know? EDIT: or maybe Xehanort already opened the box or will open the box?
  4. The ref would be interesting, but as long as they actually reward you for struggling in the next game (if it's in KHIII) I'd be happy
  5. Point 1: Well said, people need to stop complaining and wait for the story to unfold itself finally. Point 2: I think the main issue i have with this isn't that your opinion is different from mine but simply that you think that this community is some sort of hive mine that eats everything up and agrees with every opinion you have at the same time. What if I actually enjoyed the stories of the majority of the games (like I do) and actually didn't like Kingdom Hearts II and think that it lacked quality control (like I do)? What makes Kingdom Hearts II special from the other games? In my opinion, Kingdom Hearts II was the start of a problem with creating uninteresting, inconsequential Disney worlds that did little to advance an overarching narrative and were simply there for promotional materials, a problem the series would have to struggle with throughout every game after, barring Days, where I felt like the worlds were like real everyday cities for once, like Agrabah and their issues with sandstorms destroying their town. If anything, in my opinion at least, Kingdom Hearts II is the black sheep in this case, and suffered the most problems in the port-over to PS3. Also, I don't think the ports sucked. They introduced tons of new content to English viewers and other viewers across the world all while introducing new fans to a series that previously couldn't shell out the money to buy all of the consoles for it. In my honest opinion, the ports did well, but did suffer some problems, like load times and framerate drops in Birth by Sleep. I think it wasn't a lack of quality control, it was just a matter of what the player felt about them that determined the true quality of the collection, and, personally, I think if we're going to judge the rereleases on anything it's the fact that the games themselves might not be that good, not that they're just not good ports overall. Point 3: Never heard this one, but I agree with you. Point 4: Agreed. Nomura-san didn't deserve the negative comments on this video at all. Grow up people. Maybe you could write down a couple of reasons why you think the ports lacked quality control instead of just saying that they objectively were poor in quality? EDIT: I'm from the KHInsider community, nice to meet you all! I've been following this forum for months, and hope to get to know you all!
×
×
  • Create New...