GothicSlenderman

I personally prefer this style of gameplay, but I think that has more to do with taste. I like games where I hack and slash and maybe include some RPG elements but I also understand why a lot of people prefer the turn based style of gameplay

Yep, but there's still the rest of tomorrow. I just got a bit excited x3

Yeah, I know it's very unlikely. The original game did sell over 1Million units which is successful but not as successful as they wanted it to be. But a man can dream.

Please tell me they at least hinted Playstation Allstars Round 2? I've been waiting for a sequel sense DLC ended for the original game. Anything? Pwease tell me so ;3;

Now you probably think the title sounds stupid but that's only because of how the list was set up . I'm not going over just one piece of removed content per entry but a different game in the series and their removed content. NOTE: This video was literally finished and started exporting to an MP4 file right before DidYouKnowGaming uploaded their 2nd Kingdom Hearts video. If there is some content I missed featured there I apologize but I highly recommend checking them out. If you enjoyed the video please share to your friends and maybe subscribe for more. I upload every Monday, Wednesday & Friday and I plan to do more Kingdom Hearst based videos. I mainly do horror based topics just to let you know, in case you're not into that. But this is one of the few cases where it's not horror based. Anyway, enjoy! (^o^)/

Both Disney and Square-Enix are said to be there. However; this could mean anything as there is Disney Infinity 3.0, Final Fantasy VII Remake, Final Fantasy XV, World of Final Fantasy, the new Neir game and maybe some new things as well. But do you think anything Kingdom Hearts related will be shown off at the event whether that be 2.8 or KH3? I personally hope yes but my gut says no due to the Japan D23 saltiness and how rarely we get KH news.

Was this from a certain show or it's own thing?

Wait did the parents legitimately name their kids Sora and Riku or did the kids just want to call themselves that? I don't plan on having kids but if I had a girl I would name her Alice, not because of Alice in Wonderland but for one; Alice is a cute name, and 2; Alice Madness Returns. Now if I had a boy...Idk man I guess sense we're in this generation I'll just have to name him Cloud .3.

Yeah but it was not in the anime yet, and there are some people who don't read the manga and only watch the anime.

As revealed in the manga Natsu is Zerefs brother brought back to life. During the current arc of the manga I have noticed a few things. Both Natsu and Acnologia are dragon slayers, however; Acnologia was suffering through the dragnification process as Natsu might in the 2nd movie. I believe that Acnoglogia is that father of both Natsu & Zeref. Acnologia has a similar human form to Natsu's current human form but with longer silver hair. If black hair (zeref) mixed with pink hair (natsu) it would most likely result in a silver color (Acnologia's human hair) Theory: Ancologia pressured Natsu into getting into Dragon Slayer magic yet he was too young and faced the Dragonification process. He died and Zeref spent his life to bring his younger brother, Natsu, back. When Natsu was brought back and Igneel saved him and raised him so he could use Dragon Slayer magic and not face the Dragnificaion process. Now in the current Arc Acnogloia wants to kill both Natsu & Zeref for not listening to his orders. At least's that's my theory. Hbu Fairy Tail fans?

I've decided to attempt to predict some of the worlds that could be included into KH3. NOTE: If a world is on here it's not because of my own bias or desires but for their likleness and possibility. How they would fit in the story, ect. Tetsuya Numora has stated that there won't be any returning locations in KH3 yet we do see a new Hercules world being Mount Olympus. So old franchises can return just with new locations. (maybe a few minor exceptions for the story) Worlds already in KH3 -Twilight Town (+Mysterious Castle) -Mount Olympus (Hercules) -Kingdom of Corona (Tangled) -San Fransokyo (Big Hero 6/Marvel) -From my knowledge a place reffered to as Cable Town Worlds I think will be in KH3 -Radient Garden: Just so we could interact with the FFVII crew again while also adding Vincent Valentine, Barret Wallas, Cait Sith & Red XIII. Maybe some new Final Fantasy Representation like Noctus or Lightning. -Castle Oblivion/Land of Departure: We have to restore it some how and get Ventus' body back. -Keyblade Graveyard: While I do hope it returns I also hope it's not where the final battle takes place -Kingdom Hearts itself: I've always imagined Kingdom Hearts to be both the heart of all worlds and it's own world and maybe that's where the final battle will take place -Mirage Arena: If there are multiple playable characters & Multiplayer in KH3 then I'll bet that the mirage arena returns from BBS to add to those modes -Alladin & the King of Thieves: The original story went to KH1, the movies sequel was used in KH2 so it would only make sense completing Alladin's story with it's final film -Lilo & Stitch/Hawaii: Terra, Ventus & Aqua have already gone to Deep Space and Stitch was also seen in Radient Garden in KH2 but what if he found his way on to Lilo's world. This way we could see the friendship between Lilo & Stich grow and Stitch could show Sora his Wayfinder from BBS -100 Wood Acre: Just a hunch I have. -Treasure Island: Sense Roy Conly was the one showing off both the Tangled & Big Hero 6 world it would only make sense he would also reveal Treasure Island considering that he made Treasure Island, Tangled & Big Hero 6. -Emporer's New Groove: Through a rumor that says that Treasure Island, an Emporer's world & Lighting from FFXIII would be in KH3 -Toy Story: Through the leak that also showed KH 2.8 as KH 2.9 and how it was originally going to be in KH1. -The Jungle Book: How it was originaly going to be in BBS I've always had a sneaking suspicion that they wanted Sora to explore this world. -Frozen: Due to it's immense popularity and even being mroe successful than The Lion King -Wreck-it Ralph: Similar to Frozen and it's potential. -A galaxy Far Far Away/Star Wars: Due to how Disney included it in Disney Infinity & when they were making their own KH ame (Kingdom Hearts Fragmented Keys) it was originally going to be included in the project And that's just a few. What are your predictions?

Now that I didn't know. Whoops x3

While I know Disney is mainly known for animated films, they've also done live action content. So why not include some of it into KH3? Like Pirates of he Caribbean, Tron & Tron Legacy were. I've heard many arguments as to why they shouldn't be in and while I respect everyone's opinion I do have to disagree on a lot of the points. Like so? "Sora doesn't fit with Live action characters" When people bring this up they always refer to Port Royal from KH2. I game from 2 generations ago. While Sora doesn't like photo-realistic, he does look a lot more real in KH3 (so far) rather than the PS2 era. This is the 8th generation of gaming, not the 6th. "Port Royal was a bad world" It's true, I didn't like how it was set up either, but does that mean all live action worlds are going to be just like Port Royal? Following that logic because the Little Mermaid was an animated film and it's world was bad means that all animated worlds would be bad. Being based on Live Action content doesn't determine the quality of the world. It's determined on which direction the developers go in. "Kingdom Hearts should ONLY be animated" Then we should just act like Port Royal, Space Paranoids & The Grid never happened? Disney has a lot of Animated films. Even enough to go over more than 2 sagas I think but eventually they'l start to run low. So in my opinion it's better to use the live action content to delay the inevitable. And yes, I was the user that posted that list of animated films that have never been in Kingdom Hearts with almost 60 results but half of those couldn't even be in Kingdom Hearts due to the fact that they just wouldn't work, some of them were Studio Ghibli films, ect. "If live action gets into Kingdom Hearts 3 than it will be a bad game" So I guess Drwam Drop Distance, 2.5, 2.8 & KH2 are bad games then right? "What about the likeness of the actors/actresses?" It more depends on what film I guess because it didn't seem like a problem in the worlds we had so far. "What films would they even go for that would work?" -Tomorrowland -The other Pirates Films -Tim Burton's Alice in Wonderland -he Great & Powerful Oz -Return to Oz -The Zorro TV series -Who Framed Roger Rabbit? -Maleficent (or just that design used for Maleficent, but it would be awkward seeing that drastic change) -Enchanted -Mary Poppins -Hocus Pocus -Sky High -The Santa Clause -Flubber -Babe's Toyland -Something Muppets related maybe -Power Rangers I think are technically owned by Disney -The Haunted Mansion -20,000 leagues under the sea -Marvel's The Avengers (If they decided to add a purely Marvel world) -Any Start Wars film (if they decide to add any Start Wars film) There are a lot more that could work but my point is, I think live action content should be welcomed into Kingdom Hearts. It's still Disney and a lot of them are timeless films or new favorites. What are your thoughts on Live Action films?

Let's say there was a new webcomic with a decent story and loving characters but the webcomic was sketched rather than in a digital form. Like they drew it on a sketchpad and used a scanner to get it on the computer. Would you still read it?

Xion .3. I need the one Kingdom Hearts waifu out of my thousands of waifus

I think I'm decently good at Smash but I could be that guy that thinks he's good but he's really not ;3; But I'm a beast with Ganondorf, Lucina, Roy, Mewtwo & Sonic! And I can't wait for Cloud

Now that I think about it, I think it was storage but moved the game over to the PS1. But none the less, I personally believe Nintendo does deserve the best just like Microsoft, Sony & the PC gaming Community. I want them to be successful and direct the future of gaming like the PS4 & Xbox One. And that's the one thing I like about Nintendo is their innovation. Even though not all of their ideas worked and sometimes they can come off as gimmicky, but I still love Nintendo for what it is. Yeah and SEGA needs to focus on their other IPs. I mean when's the last time we've seen a new Comix Zone, Ristar or Nights game?

I didn't know that. But I wasn't trying to call them ripoffs just trying to show that the ripoff label a lot of people have usually isn't something thats not really a ripoff like PSASBR

Yeah, I know Nintendo doesn't get a free pass all the time. There are a lot of Nintendo fans including myself that understand that Nintendo isn't perfect. No one really is.

Before I say anything I just want to make it clear. I am a fan of Nintendo's work and this post is not at all meant to generate hate. I grew up on almost all sides of the "console war" I owned an NES, SNES, N64, Gamecube, Wii, WiiU, DS, Gameboy, GBA, 3DS and while most of you may not believe me I also own a Virtual Boy. I have owned a PS1, PS2, PS3, PS4 & PSP. I have played on the Xbox & Xbox 360 and I sometimes dabble with PC Gaming every now and then. So I don't want people to think I'm just a fanboy or a troll attempting to generate a flame war. Just a simple debate or maybe explanation. I love Nintendo but I feel as if they really need to improve. So I've noticed something through out the years of being a gamer and there's something bugging me. It feels like Nintendo gets a free pass. And when I say free pass I don't mean the media, yes the media will always focus on the "more powerful" competitors like the PS4 & Xbox One. But it feels like the fans let Nintendo get away with more than they should. Here are some good examples. 1. Whenever the PS4 or Xbox One is weaker than one or the other people go insane. But they let Nintendo, a company who has been in the business fairly longer than both of them be a generation weaker. -The Gameboy didn't get a back light up until 2003 with the GBA but the SEGA Game gear was built with a back light. There was the Gameboy Light released in 1999...only in Japan. 2. Technically the NES was weaker than the SEGA MAster System but the only reason it sold so well was because Nintendo made it difficult for 3rd Party Developers to release games on other systems but the NES 3. The N64 with cartridges as the PS1 had DVD disc. Need I also have to mention that FFVII was originally going to be a 64 title but was moved over to the PS1 because Square thought the system wasn't powerful enough to capture their vision. And they were right, FFVII became one of the best selling PS1 titles. 4. The Gamecube used mini DVD Disc limiting the system so many companies wanted to focus on the Xbox & PS2 (quick reminder the PS2 became the world's best selling video game console selling over 125 Million Units and it wasn't even the most powerful system of that generation. That tile goes to the Xbox) This is why many story driven games like Silent Hill, Kingdom Hearts & Most Final Fantasy games from FFVII to FVXII were Playstation Exclusive. 5. The Wii was the first time people could visibly see the difference between it and it's competitors. It sold amazingly but even Shigeru Miyamoto ha said that he regrets not making the Wii an HD system. The Wii became home to many great games but also was home to many cash grabs like Licensed games, Pets Cats, ect. 6. I don't realy have to say anything about the Wii U besides that less 3rd Party Developers are developing for while at the same time are making bigger games on on the next generation systems. ZombiU was originally exclusive up until it was ported to other systems recently under the name Zombi You could argue that power doesn't matter and you can still have a powerful system with no games to play and a weak system with better games to play. But here's the thing, more power = bigger games. Remember when I mentioned FFVII and how it became one of the PS1's best selling titles? Remember when I mentioned Silent Hill, Kingdom Hearts & some of the other Final Fantasy games? Then people go on about that the Wii U has more exclusives than the PS4 & Xbox One and they barely have any exclusives. While I feel like both the PS4 & Xbox One need more exclusives at least PS4/Xbox One players can get Kingdom Hearts 3, Final Fantasy XV, Minecraft, Fallout 4, Grand Theft Auto V & multiple other titles. Also while I'm not going to tell people what they can or cannot buy but I personally the Amiibos are just glorified on disc DLC. And not to say I won't try to get my hands on a Lucina amiibo for she is my Waifu .3. You pay for a game and you should be able to access all of the data on the disc right? So why do I need a Link Amiibo to get the Spinner weapon? Why do I need the Chibi-Robo Amiibo to play as Super Chibi-Robo? Why do I need the Ike, Marth, Robin & Lucina Amiibos to play as them in Project S.T.E.A.M.? Many people have argued that "the content isn't that big" or "is not required" But most normal DLC isn't required unless you look at some Activision or EA Games. And it shouldn't matter if the content is big, small, required or not you still technically purchased the product so why make another purchase to access it? Now you could also argue that maybe you happened to by the amiibo before you new it was compatible with the game you just bought. But none the less you still need that Amiibo to access the content so it is still an extra purchase. Many people also say that you could just collect the amiibos and not use them. And that's fine, (as I already said I'm getting that Lucina Amiibo for that exact reason for she best waifu .3.)but not everyone buys the same product for the same reason. Then there's Nintendo Badge Arcade. A game where you collect badges to put on your 3DS or New 3DS home page. The first 5 plays are free but here's what gets me, you have to pay $1 to get 5 more tries. In other words = Microtransactions. Now you could argue that you could play the Practice part of the game and get more tries from that but then why do they even have the option to buy more tries with real money if you could just practice? So you don't have to wait? Just like EA's Mobile game "Dungeon Keeper" where you continue but something might be blocking your path. You can either pay to continue or wait the time for the time to end. Nintendo Badge Arcade - First it's free but then you can either pay $1 for 5 more tries or play the practice round. EA's Dungeon Keeper - First it's free but then you can either pay a certain amount of money to continue or wait for the time to end. I've heard many arguments like "It's barley even a game so what does it matter?" Like the on disc DLC thing the content could be big, small, required or not required it's still microtransactions. "It's not Mario or Zelda so what does it matter?" Following that logic then Dungeon Keepers is fine because it's not Dead Space or Alice Madness Returns. And I'm sure that if Mario or Zelda or Pokemon got microtransactions everyone will just submit to it and find some way to defend it. Square Enix Cancels a FAN 3D remake of Chrono Trigger - "You guys are the worst!" SEGA Cancels a FAN Hd remake of Streets of Rage - "How dare they?!" Nintendo cancels a FAN HD recreation of ONE level of Super Mario 64 - "Nintendo's right to do this!" REALLY? So when it's Nintendo it's fine? That's the logic I'm hearing at least. Now I'm not going to get into copyright laws or fair use because even if I did, you see how fans react when it's Square or SEGA but have to complete opposite reaction when it's Nintendo. Some people have said that it's because Mario 64 was getting released on the Wii U virtual console and they didn't want the remake to shift the sales. But how does that make any sense? 1. It's a remake of one level. 2. Mario 64 has been released multiple times before. So even it if did shift the sales I don't think it would be that much of a loss compared to things like Smash 4, Splatoon or Mario Kart 8. Then we have the "rip off" label. To me Playstation Allstars is the same idea to Smash but it's executed differently with being able to defeat your opponents with an allstar move instead of throughing them outside of the arena. Amiibo is the same idea to Skylanders or Disney Infinity but it's executed differently with the amiibos being used in more than just one game and aren't used for just characters. But can you guess which one is called the rip off and which is called either completely original or just inspired? Sonic & SEGA Allstars Racing & Crash Nitro Kart - RIP OFF OF MARIO KART Mario Kart gets the jumping mechanic from CNK - OMG They were inspired! (Most likely they were but you're getting my point though right?) LittleBigPlanet - MARIO RIPOFF (How? Because they're platformers?) Then we have the stupid argument with "Nintendo did it first" So following that logic Megaman, Pacman, Rayman, Sonic the Hedgehog, Earthworm Jim, LittleBigPlanet, Super Meat Boy, Shovel Knight and even some of Nintendo's other series like Kirby & Donkey Kong are ripping off Mario because they're all 2D platoformers but Mario did it first. That also means that Earthbound & Pokemon are ripping off Final Fantasy because they did the turn based RPG "first" that also means that Splatoon, Halo & Call of Duty were ripping off Wolfenstein 3D because they're all shooters but Wolfenstein 3D did it first. "All you see from PS4 & Xbox Ones are just remasters" There are a couple of remasters/remakes but don't even think that Nintendo isn't guilty of this as well. (And I'm not calling these bad games by all means but I'm bringing them up to prove a point) Wind Waker HD, Twilight Princess HD, Ocarina of Time 3D, Majora's Mask 3D and the only original Zelda game coming in this generation is the unnamed Wii U title. Starfox 64 3D, Mario 64 DS, Pikmin released on the Wii, ect. All 3 of the big 1st Party developers are guilty of the remastered thing. "Nintendo should buy Banjo-Kazooie, Sonic & Megaman. They would make better games" 1. Sonic & Megaman have been multiplatform for years and there are many PS, Xbox & PC gamers who love these characters just as much as you do so why ruin the fun for them? 2. Nintendo can barley even balance their own IPs with at least 3 Mario games each year and I'm ok with spinoffs but raise of hands. How many people would rather play "Mario Ultra Tennis" on Wii U than a new Metroid or F-Zero game? 3. Nintendo recently made a new IP, Splatoon...14 years after they made their 2nd most recent IP being Pikmin. 14 YEARS! 4. Why haven't we seen Punch-Out! come back after the 2009 game? Where's Star Tropics, Metroid after Metroid the Other M, Earthbound, Balloon Fight, Ice Climbers, Golden Sun, ect. There's Starfox Zero...2 generations after the last Starfox game. And where's F-Zero? From what I recall Nintendo had said they want to continue the series when they think of a way to innovate it but is it really going to take over 2 gaming generations to do this? An Indie game is already bringing back the F-Zero formula being Fast Racing Neo and Nintendo even showed this game off in their most recent Direct. If it's been so long then there might not be a need to add something new sense Fast Racing Neo is already popular by a lot of people. What I'm trying to say is before Nintendo even considers to buy other IPs they need to balance out their own. So idk what to expect in the comments below. I'm either going to get rational responses telling me whether or not the commenter agrees or disagrees. Or a flame war where I'm just referred as a Troll or Fanboy. One again I was not trying to cause any trouble I just wanted to speak my mind and see if anyone else agreed or disagreed.

While it was never been said I've had this though of what if both Destiny Islands and Twilight Town take place in the same world. Evidence? Sure! 1. This would explain why in every Kingdom Hearts game where either Destiny Islands or Twilight Town are accessible (with the exception being Chain of Memories due to the fact that hey were memory based replicas) Only 1 or the other can be entered by normal means. 2. By the station in Twilight Town is the ocean horizon and obvious place you could possibly connect both the ocean surrounding Destiny Islands and the horizon in Twilight Town. 3. Characters from Final Fantasy VIII were both born and raised in Destiny Islands and Twilight Town. (with the exception of Tidus & Wakka from Final Fantasy X) Selphie is in Destiny Islands and Seifer, Rai, Fuu & Vivi are in Twilight Town. 4. Both have similar locations like the cave in Destiny Islands to the Secret place in Twilight Town. The place where Hayner, Pence & Ollette laid in the grass after searching for the mysteries is similar to the tree that Sora, Riku & Kairi sit at. 5. Lastly the town Kairi is seen in during the few cutscenes in KH2 looks like a poor version of a neighborhood from Twilight Town. While they may not be side by side I think that maybe they at least are close to each other in the same world. What are your thoughts

11/16/15 Update released!

That's an interesting idea and something a lot of people have suggested. But I personally would rather work with an original story and concepts. But maybe a side project wouldn't hurt. I'l keep it in mind.

Probably, but it won't hurt to at least try. If it doesn't work than I'll go to the route of original worlds based on Urban Legends, Fairy Tails, Fair Use Material (like Cthulhu) and what not.

I like that idea, but I'm not sure if I'm going the route of all original worlds. It's more based on if I can't get the permission/rights to use other horror indie games/indie animations/writers of creepypasta Thanks! (^o^)/ I got the idea of the name Arrythmia because it's another term for an irregular heartbeat. Horror and scares tend to make your heart stop sometimes. Originally Arrythmia was going to be just a collection of minihorror games but I think this idea is better!