Codeman1346

Thanks guys for clearing that up. I just got pretty giddy over the thought of not needing to purchase a ps4.

http://www.kdramastars.com/articles/35969/20140907/kingdom-hearts-3-release-date.htmThis website among others have stated that KH3 will be released on May 15th 2015, and for PS3 on top of PS4 and Xbox1. My question is about the legitimacy of these claims. Both in reference to The Release date and the old Generation release.

This is the most valid point used so far. Just because all of the bad guys think that Sora was not meant to wield, does not mean he was not chosen by fate. I have said it in a different thread, "My theory is that Riku was initially supposed to gain the ability to summon the Kingdom key, but when he fell to darkness Sora intercepted it, and initially he was only able to carry it because of Ven's heart. I read the manga and it always shows him carrying his key around his belt up until the fight with Riku where the KeyBlade chooses him. From that point on, the Kingdom Key was his, and he could summon it and dismiss it at will. Riku then was able to summon his own key, thus making Sora a wielder without the rite to succession. This is just a theory based on others sources of media that may or may not be cannon." Besides, Namora stated that the kingdom Key is HIS when he was talking about Roxas, he said that Roxas barrows the KingdomKey from Sora, and when he began duel wielding, he borrowed Ven's as well. That makes two different keyblades. I am not sure if you can follow, but that means Sora, in fact, is a wielder now, even if he was not supposed to be at first. All of that being said, I honestly do believe that Sora will be one of the lights because the only point you have against it is a loose Japanese translation. You can't break it into specifics when you only have loose translations as your back up. If we are arguing specifics, you say that only the ones who could wield at the time of the original shattering of the X-blade could be lights. This was before the Keyblade war, and therefor, FAR before the time of Riku's or even Terra, Aqua, and Ven's births. Thus making that argument null and void.

I thought Namora said that he released games in threes (not including remakes), and BBSv2 was the 2nd in the KH3 Trilogy. 1) Kingdom Hearts. Chain of Memories. Kingdom Hearts 2. 2) 358/2 Days. Birth By Sleep. Coded. 3) Dream, Drop, Distance. Birth by Sleep: v2. Kingdom Hearts 3. Birth by Sleep was made by the team that made 13 (hence the wait on it, and the wait between 13 and 13-2), and therefore will be made by a different team than Versus 13. I vote Handheld title, because if it is on the ps3 I will have to buy that, and whatever system that happens to carry Kingdom Hearts 3. I really just want to skip this generation all together.

To further the discussion, Namora also stated that only a being with a heart inside of them can summon a keyblade. If Roxas "grew" his own heart it would have taken far to long and he wouldn't have been able to summon it in the first couple days being in the organization. My theory is that Riku was initially supposed to gain the ability to summon the Kingdom key, but when he fell to darkness Sora intercepted it, but he was only able to carry it because of Ven's heart. I read the manga and it always shows him carrying his key around his belt up until the fight with Riku where the KeyBlade chooses him. From that point on, the Kingdom Key was his, and he could summon it and dismiss it at will. Riku then was able to summon his own key, thus making Sora a wielder without the rite to succession. This is just a theory based on others sources of media that may or may not be cannon. Now back to the original discussion, I do not think he deserves to be a Keyblade Master. Being The Key that binds everything together and his ability to become stronger with every person he connects with, I think he isn't going to draw his power from the title of master, and therefore does not need it.