Exiblade7 1,917 Posted October 15, 2015 (edited) use this post that I did on miiverse to tell my either this is really fake or not even though there might be a nintendo direct coming out this month. I just want to solve this mystery once and for all. I just don't know what to think about this rumor anymore. Here's the leak http://wiiubrew.org/wiki/Title_database#00050000:_Wii_U_game_titles Here's the post: https://miiverse.nintendo.net/posts/AYMHAAACAAADVHkiE0r3Vg Edited October 15, 2015 by Luke Fon Fabre Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kyouma-Blade 90 Posted October 15, 2015 use this post that I did on miiverse to tell my either this is really fake or not even though there might be a nintendo direct coming out this month. I just want to solve this mystery once and for all. I just don't know what to think about this rumor anymore. Here's the leak http://wiiubrew.org/wiki/Title_database#00050000:_Wii_U_game_titles Here's the post: https://miiverse.nintendo.net/posts/AYMHAAACAAADVHkiE0r3Vg Based purely on the links provided, it seems like more vapid claims without any solid proof. I have no outside knowledge of this, by the way, so correct me if I'm wrong. From the first link, "Note to journalists: This unofficialdocument is not necessarily accurate." Right at the top of the page. Self explanatory, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's fake. It's also a text document, so it's super easy to make it up. The second link is silly. The person who posted it has no proof whatsoever, just correlations and theories. The Doctor makes a sound argument, but the poster deflects it by asking for proof. Like, what? The burden of proof is on you, Kaito. You didn't prove anything, just posted some things that may or may not be happening. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Exiblade7 1,917 Posted October 15, 2015 (edited) Based purely on the links provided, it seems like more vapid claims without any solid proof. I have no outside knowledge of this, by the way, so correct me if I'm wrong. From the first link, "Note to journalists: This unofficialdocument is not necessarily accurate." Right at the top of the page. Self explanatory, but it doesn't necessarily mean it's fake. It's also a text document, so it's super easy to make it up. The second link is silly. The person who posted it has no proof whatsoever, just correlations and theories. The Doctor makes a sound argument, but the poster deflects it by asking for proof. Like, what? The burden of proof is on you, Kaito. You didn't prove anything, just posted some things that may or may not be happening. yeah, you're right. It is a wiki page so it can be changed by anybody. I kinda had proof, but it was like on the tip of my tongue. Now I know it. The creator of the zelda series did say something like 2 years ago that it's possible that TP may get a remaster in the future. Edited October 15, 2015 by Luke Fon Fabre Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kyouma-Blade 90 Posted October 15, 2015 yeah, you're right. It is a wiki page so it can be changed by anybody. I kinda had proof, but it was like on the tip of my tongue. Now I know it. The creator of the zelda series did say something like 2 years ago that it's possible that TP may get a remaster in the future. That's not exactly proof either. It's a possibility, not that it's happening. There are plenty of creators who said something was a possibility, but ended up not happening, whether or not it was outside of their control. This does add a little bit more to the leak, but it's a water droplet in a fire, in the grand scheme of things. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites