Omega Ness 112 Posted April 19, 2014 (edited) Sure ****. Everyone, I'm kidding. This SHOULD NOT BY ALL MEANS BE TAKEN SERIOUSLY! Edited April 19, 2014 by Jynexo Gingell Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shulk 8,623 Posted April 19, 2014 I call then Surskit, because all are terrible. (They have a good design though) 2 Pangoro "Sen" and Omega Ness reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Pangoro "Sen" 445 Posted April 19, 2014 I call then Surskit, because all are terrible. (They have a good design though) Yeah, basically this. Even as Masquerain, they're terrible. -1/10 DO NOT USE! 3 Omega Ness, OmegaForte and Shulk reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Fierce Deity Link 926 Posted April 19, 2014 Surskiterrible? 2 Shulk and Omega Ness reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hero of Winds 2,576 Posted April 19, 2014 Someone out there's gonna make Surskit look way too good. I have a friend who made it a hobby to see what pokemon people complain about or make fun of and then flawlessly use them several times in competitive battling. 1 Robbie the Wise reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Robbie the Wise 5,050 Posted April 19, 2014 Someone out there's gonna make Surskit look way too good. I have a friend who made it a hobby to see what pokemon people complain about or make fun of and then flawlessly use them several times in competitive battling.Level 1 Aron ftw Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
OmegaForte 1,674 Posted April 19, 2014 (edited) Yeah, basically this. Even as Masquerain, they're terrible. -1/10 DO NOT USE! This is even counting Masquerain with gimmicky teams on higher tiers. lawl Edited April 19, 2014 by OmegaForte Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
VisitJoan 2,713 Posted April 27, 2014 They're so cute! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
