It's ridiculous that kingdom hearts is still PS3 only

[Skyace 65 75]

how sensitive

I own all the consoles xbox 360, ps3 and wii (coming soon wii u) cuz I think good games are good it doesn't matter in what console they are,

don't judge me just because the I like the ps3 a bit more  

 

i dont judge you because you like the PS3 more. i judge you because you think its right to limit the avalibility of a fantastic game by console when there is no reason to other than blind fanboyism and being a #&$%

[Ultima Weapon 71]

Hmmm it's exclusive because it's a marketing strategy, and is for selling more consoles, in this case ps3, when the companies make their games multiconsole is because they fear they don't going to sell enough to make profits, in the case of the KH they are so sure they going to sell it that they can make it exclusive. And that strategy really works they made me buy a psp just to play the KH BbS and a NintendoDS to play 358/2days. (OMG I guess I'm a fanboy after all, but a Kingdom hearts fanboy)

[Skyace 65 75]

Hmmm it's exclusive because it's a marketing strategy, and is for selling more consoles, in this case ps3, when the companies make their games multiconsole is because they fear they don't going to sell enough to make profits, in the case of the KH they are so sure they going to sell it that they can make it exclusive. And that strategy really works they made me buy a psp just to play the KH BbS and a NintendoDS to play 358/2days. (OMG I guess I'm a fanboy after all, but a Kingdom hearts fanboy)

your logic is flawed in several areas.

 

number 1 square enix does not profit at all from PS3 sales, square enix isnt trying to sell more console they are trying to sell more games, and they would do that a lot better if KH was on PC and maybe wii U.

2 companies dont make games multiconsole out of fear its to make more money. if i had a fantastic game i knew was going to do well on console i would defeniately port it over to another one that could handle it so i could make even more money and get a larger fanbase. being multiconsole dosent degrade quality.

 

FEZ which is currently an xbox eclusive has plans to be ported to several differnt consoles its so good

 

valve a PC distributor makes their games playable on console even though it could do fine just with sales on PC. Does portal 2 being multi-console mean it couldnt stand on its own? or half-life 2? or left 4 dead? no, it dosent. 

Edited January 30, 2013 by Skyace 65

[Ultima Weapon 71]

your logic is flawed in several areas.

 

number 1 square enix does not profit at all from PS3 sales, square enix isnt trying to sell more console they are trying to sell more games, and they would do that a lot better if KH was on PC and maybe wii U.

2 companies dont make games multiconsole out of fear its to make more money. if i had a fantastic game i knew was going to do well on console i would defeniately port it over to another one that could handle it so i could make even more money and get a larger fanbase. being multiconsole dosent degrade quality.

 

FEZ which is currently an xbox eclusive has plans to be ported to several differnt consoles its so good

 

valve a PC distributor makes their games playable on console even though it could do fine just with sales on PC. Does portal 2 being multi-console mean it couldnt stand on its own? or half-life 2? or left 4 dead? no, it dosent. 

 

Pffff please don't compare it with the games for download they are nice games but not the better, and half life wasn't multiconsole at the beginning, they made ports for other consoles later, and how could you possibly know that square enix doesn't have some kind of profit, maybe sony don't give them cash but obviously they have some arrangement, business are business.

[OblivionXP 0]

Yes, because getting a Wii U for $300 is so much more expensive then getting a PS3 for $300.

 

If you think the Wii U is expensive, think back to getting a PS3 back at launch. Only reason why I don't regret my $599 US Dollar purchase is because it can upscale PS1/PS2 games. Heck, even the Xbox 360 too; it was just as much as the Wii U. (sorry if my memory is bad in case I'm wrong)

 

http://www.gamestop.com/browse/playstation-3/systems?nav=138d-c4&loc=storefrontheader+cs_ps3

 

Check that out and say that the Wii U and the PS3 are the same price -_-

[Skyace 65 75]

Pffff please don't compare it with the games for download they are nice games but not the better, and half life wasn't multiconsole at the beginning, they made ports for other consoles later, and how could you possibly know that square enix doesn't have some kind of profit, maybe sony don't give them cash but obviously they have some arrangement, business are business.

 

it dosent matter its still the smae principle download or not, you can't say it applies to games that only have physical copys, FEZ was a massive succes and making it multiplatform is going to make it even more of a succes. being one console just limits a games sucess, you can't argue against that. and keeping a game to one platform dosent magically make it better

 

at the begining or not half-life was still eventually ported, and portal 2 was multi-console from the begining.

 

and i highly doubt square has some kind of arangement with PS3 since KH and FF are the ONLY games square keeps strictly on that platform and handheld, if they really did have a deal all of their games would be PS3 only.

Edited January 31, 2013 by Skyace 65

[Gripper 6]

http://www.gamestop.com/browse/playstation-3/systems?nav=138d-c4&loc=storefrontheader+cs_ps3

 

Check that out and say that the Wii U and the PS3 are the same price -_-

Yeah, they are. I didn't need anymore evidence; but thanks anyway.

[jtshiro 14]

it dosent matter its still the smae principle download or not, you can't say it applies to games that only have physical copys, FEZ was a massive succes and making it multiplatform is going to make it even more of a succes. being one console just limits a games sucess, you can't argue against that. and keeping a game to one platform dosent magically make it better

 

at the begining or not half-life was still eventually ported, and portal 2 was multi-console from the begining.

 

and i highly doubt square has some kind of arangement with PS3 since KH and FF are the ONLY games square keeps strictly on that platform and handheld, if they really did have a deal all of their games would be PS3 only.

 

I agree that Square has no arrangement with Sony, but Final Fantasy isn't strictly on Sony systems (though they never left) as you have suggested look at the Nintendo handhelds getting spinoffs/remakes of FF games and Xbox getting FFXIII and its sequels.  Kingdom Hearts has been on Nintendo consoles and mobile phones too.  Square isn't nearly as devoted to any console as they were back in the PS1/PS2 days.  As for this specific game it cannot be stressed enough that Square is making this gamefor the Japanese market first and foremost (international release is important but KH is seemingly more popular in Japan) that means PS3 is going to be the home console of choice at the moment for an HD remaster.

[MythrilMagician 6,963]

Far out! Kh1.5 will stay only for PS3 no matter what! I'm already sick of people saying that kh1.5 should be on Xbox and whatnot, and I've hardly seen any!

[Terranort9406 288]

Nobody wants KH on Wii U! Wii/Wii U isn't the right console for such a game. DBZ Budokai Tenkaichi 3 was available on Wii and it sucked. Don't want a KH Game to suck too. Just let it be how it is, it's the best for the perfect performance.

I want a KH for Wii U