Do you think Sora will still be able to dual wield after restoring Ventus?

[Robbie the Wise 5,050]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="Flaming Lea" data-cid="929036" data-time="1355956181"><p>No but he's laid out the very reason why was Sora and Roxas could which involves them having another wielders heart inside them . So yes it would be a retcon</p></blockquote>I'm sorry? I don't understand what you are trying to say.

Nomura has laid out a set of rules that act as qualifications for dual wielding if he changes them later on that's a retcon.

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

No but he's laid out the very reason why was Sora and Roxas could which involves them having another wielders heart inside them . So yes it would be a retcon

I'm sorry? I don't understand what you are trying to say.

 

 

This.

Nomura has laid out a set of rules that act as qualifications for dual wielding if he changes them later on that's a retcon.

[Skratch 0]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="devereauxr" data-cid="929064" data-time="1355957423"><p>

Nomura has laid out a set of rules that act as qualifications for dual wielding if he changes them later on that's a retcon.</p></blockquote>

 

Ahhh ok now I understand. There were so many gramatical mistakes I just couldn't understand what flaming lea was trying to say. Thanks for clearing that up.

 

I still don't think that it would be a retcon because as I said nomura has never said exactly what will happen when they all separate. He's said WHY they can dual wield but not what will happen AFTER they separate. At least not to my knowledge.

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

Nomura has laid out a set of rules that act as qualifications for dual wielding if he changes them later on that's a retcon.

Ahhh ok now I understand. There were so many gramatical mistakes I just couldn't understand what flaming lea was trying to say. Thanks for clearing that up.I still don't think that it would be a retcon because as I said nomura has never said exactly what will happen when they all separate. He's said WHY they can dual wield but not what will happen AFTER they separate. At least not to my knowledge.

Wow that was very rude .He had no problem reading what I said even if I used shorthand .. It was pretty straight forward. Nomura said straight up that Ven's heart being inside Sora and Roxas was why they could wield Ven's keyblade.Secondly in CoM Sora didn't have Ven's heart in him and he could NOT dual wield then . Why? Because ven's heart was in Roxas

[Robbie the Wise 5,050]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="devereauxr" data-cid="929064" data-time="1355957423"><p>Nomura has laid out a set of rules that act as qualifications for dual wielding if he changes them later on that's a retcon.</p></blockquote>Ahhh ok now I understand. There were so many gramatical mistakes I just couldn't understand what flaming lea was trying to say. Thanks for clearing that up.I still don't think that it would be a retcon because as I said nomura has never said exactly what will happen when they all separate. He's said WHY they can dual wield but not what will happen AFTER they separate. At least not to my knowledge.

Um I'm pretty sure her point was pretty clear.

Also If Nomura lays out the specific conditions for an ability to occur then removing those conditions will remove that ability. Not for nothing that's pretty much common sense. Also he specifically lays out a set of guidlines and changes it later, it is indeed a retcon just saying.

[Ptolema 404]

Sora can dual wield because he carries Ventus's Heart within himself. Roxas uses both Sora's and Ventus's Keyblade. It would be logical to think Sora will lose dual-wielding if he returns Ventus's Heart. Unless Nomuralogic comes to play.

[Skratch 0]

<blockquote class='ipsBlockquote'data-author="devereauxr" data-cid="929202" data-time="1355963455"><p>

Um I'm pretty sure her point was pretty clear.<br />

Also If Nomura lays out the specific conditions for an ability to occur then removing those conditions will remove that ability. Not for nothing that's pretty much common sense. Also he specifically lays out a set of guidlines and changes it later, it is indeed a retcon just saying.</p></blockquote>

 

Well I'm sorry if you thought it was clear, I however had a hard time understanding what flaming lea said. Yes indeed that is common sense. Why you had to point that out to me is beyond me. I already know the conditions for dual wielding and can understand why the ability would be taken away with out the conditions. But nomura can do whatever he wants and if he wants to let sora and roxas keep their dual wielding then what I was saying is that could be a reason he uses to allow it.

 

And obviously you don't understand what a retcon is. Because a retcon is when a meaning or something that has been done in the past is changed to fit better with the plot. Nomura would not be changing anything because he has never stated the rules for what happens after the hearts and bodies are separated. Even if it was a retcon who would care, nomura has made so many in series its hard to track, so whats the problem?

 

At flaming lea: in CoM sora had never displayed having the ability to dual wield, thus he never lost it, because he never had it in the first place.

 

Are you two like a couple or something?

 

Edit: I'm also not the only one who had the thought about sora and roxas's dual wielding future. Elizagreenstar just made the same point I did...

Edited December 20, 2012 by Skratch

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

Um I'm pretty sure her point was pretty clear.

Also If Nomura lays out the specific conditions for an ability to occur then removing those conditions will remove that ability. Not for nothing that's pretty much common sense. Also he specifically lays out a set of guidlines and changes it later, it is indeed a retcon just saying.

Well I'm sorry if you thought it was clear, I however had a hard time understanding what flaming lea said. Yes indeed that is common sense. Why you had to point that out to me is beyond me. I already know the conditions for dual wielding and can understand why the ability would be taken away with out the conditions. But nomura can do whatever he wants and if he wants to let sora and roxas keep their dual wielding then what I was saying is that could be a reason he uses to allow it.And obviously you don't understand what a retcon is. Because a retcon is when a meaning or something that has been done in the past is changed to fit better with the plot. Nomura would not be changing anything because he has never stated the rules for what happens after the hearts and bodies are separated. Even if it was a retcon who would care, nomura has made so many in series its hard to track, so whats the problem?At flaming lea: in CoM sora had never displayed having the ability to dual wield, thus he never lost it, because he never had it in the first place.Are you two like a couple or something?Edit: I'm also not the only one who had the thought about sora and roxas's dual wielding future. Elizagreenstar just made the same point I did...

Skratch Sora never displayed dual wielding in CoM because he COULDN'T. Nomura discussed in interviews who shared what( and what keyblades were used when and why) during their separation during that time span.From the moment we ever saw Sora in CoM he had already been separated from Ven's heart in Roxas.LOL Funny how you try to illogically detract from a point where it proves your point wrong  . Just like you tried to say you couldn't understand what I said when nobody else had reading issues this whole thread or any other post i've ever made for that matter .As for retcon , it's YOU who can't figure out that what you are proposing is indeed the very definition of a retcon because as we both stated , NOMURA LAID OUT THE CONDITIONS ALREADY FOR DUAL WIELDING . Changing that would indeed make it a retcon whether you want to admit to it or not, whether you try to twist your logic to fit it or not.If you want to use the 'nomura logic' answer , admit it for what it is : Nomura retconning. Don't try to sugarcoat it..Yes Nomura retcons and who said we cared if he did ? My point is I'm laying out the facts and until Nomura actually does retcon this, the fact is based on Nomuras own words they would lose dual wielding..Nomura's words= canon until he actually does retcon it..That's even IF since there's no indication he ever intends to retcon this. Finally we aren't a couple .We were both following this thread since we were both actively posting on it .Common sense.

Edited December 20, 2012 by Flaming Lea

[Kishira 2,854]

Alright you three, enough. You've made your points, time to move on.

[SoraKH 793]

No because Ventus was the one who gave him the ability to Dual wield

[aaronarrgh 41]

So, in KH1, could Sora have wielded 3 keyblades? Sora, Ven, and Kairi LOL. 

[Roy 137]

Yes, Ventus heart may be gone, but Roxas' one will not, afterall Roxas was the nobody who had a heart.

So therefore he can wield 2 Keyblades.

Actually all nobodies had a heart or else they be like xenmas....with no emotion.

[Robbie the Wise 5,050]

So, in KH1, could Sora have wielded 3 keyblades? Sora, Ven, and Kairi LOL. 

No Kairi had yet to get her own keyblade, therefore there was no keyblade for hime to access.

[Weiss 8,279]

I don't think he will unless he finds some new way to do it which I doubt.

[Xer 670]

Actually all nobodies had a heart or else they be like xenmas....with no emotion.

I actually have played KH3D, but thats a spoiler.

[Rami 11]

terranort is zoro from one piece, he has three hearts inside him and all of them can summon a keyblade

[nintuba64 0]

What i think nemora is going to do for the sake of gameplay, because let's face it beating heartless to death was twice as fun with two keyblades, is he will say that sora in addition to his own keyblade, his heart is connected to so many others, that on thier own are too weak to wield, together, like in sora can work together to summon a second