I doubt you all agree but Oh Well...

[Geralt 4,874]

So i'm just gonna get straight to the point here if people who vote to ban gay marriage and think they can control their lives and not let them get married why can't we just vote to ban Hetero marriages? and It's just a point i mean no harm to all you Straight peeps D: But you know what I mean it kinda seems so fair.

[Koko 3,944]

because hetero marriages are the 'norm'

as well, it's firetrucking hypocritical to get mad because someone wants to take away my rights and then take away theirs

it's not fair and doesn't get the point across.

[burnsideking24 256]

Then no one would get married and marriage will die and lots of divorce lawyers are going to go out of business in a few generations. Pretty much, it'll destroy some people's businesses so no. But I think gay marriage shouldn't be banned. Some married couples make it seem like its not that great, so why not let gays share their misery together as well?

[TheApprenticeofKingMickey 3,689]

Yes, because banning heterosexual marriage is such a perfectly INTELLIGENT and PEACEFUL way to stop the oppression of gay marriage.

Edited June 1, 2012 by TheApprenticeofKingMickey

[Geralt 4,874]

because hetero marriages are the 'norm'

as well, it's firetrucking hypocritical to get mad because someone wants to take away my rights and then take away theirs

it's not fair and doesn't get the point across.

 

I know I know but it kinda does make a point I mean if they want to ruin how we live why dont we do it to them? and Im just making a point not saying I ever would cause a huge majority of my friends are Straight as well is the Man i love ><

[TheApprenticeofKingMickey 3,689]

I know I know but it kinda does make a point I mean if they want to ruin how we live why dont we do it to them? and Im just making a point not saying I ever would cause a huge majority of my friends are Straight as well is the Man i love ><

 

Because doing something like that is firetrucking immature.

[Koko 3,944]

I know I know but it kinda does make a point I mean if they want to ruin how we live why dont we do it to them? and Im just making a point not saying I ever would cause a huge majority of my friends are Straight as well is the Man i love ><

 

It doesn't make a point, it just makes us look like assholes as well.

[Geralt 4,874]

It doesn't make a point, it just makes us look like assholes as well.

 

I guess :I

[Kaiso 2,764]

There shouldn't be ANY laws that prohibit the marriage between two people that genuinely love one another. There isn't anything "fair" about banning one or the other. It shouldn't matter if the two people are gay/straight/whatever. If they want to marry then they should be allowed to marry. Besides, banning that would only feed fire to the flame and wouldn't get anything productive done towards and gay rights movements and would just make the people fighting for the community look like assholes too.

[Geralt 4,874]

There shouldn't be ANY laws that prohibit the marriage between two people that genuinely love one another. There isn't anything "fair" about banning one or the other. It shouldn't matter if the two people are gay/straight/whatever. If they want to marry then they should be allowed to marry. Besides, banning that would only feed fire to the flame and wouldn't get anything productive done towards and gay rights movements and would just make the people fighting for the community look like assholes too.

 

Indeed but I mean just bringing the point of banning them =_= like i said never will happen wouldn't it kind of be right and by what I mean is if they can control us we can control them if you get me? I know its not a way to solve anything and its plain cruel but do any of you get where i'm kind of going here?

[Koko 3,944]

Indeed but I mean just bringing the point of banning them =_= like i said never will happen wouldn't it kind of be right and by what I mean is if they can control us we can control them if you get me? I know its not a way to solve anything and its plain cruel but do any of you get where i'm kind of going here?

 

No we don't

It sounds like you're saying

'IF THEYRE BEING ASSHOLES TO US THEN WE SHOULD BE IMMATURE AND BE ASSHOLES TOO'

there's no point because the debate of banning hetero marriage would never even come up anyways lol

[TheApprenticeofKingMickey 3,689]

Indeed but I mean just bringing the point of banning them =_= like i said never will happen wouldn't it kind of be right and by what I mean is if they can control us we can control them if you get me? I know its not a way to solve anything and its plain cruel but do any of you get where i'm kind of going here?

 

Banning any kind of marriage does not make the opposing party any less wrong.

[Geralt 4,874]

Ahh whatever Never mind but Anyhow Love in my opinion is the most powerful thing ever and if they want to take it away well then hehe Lets all move to Canada or somewhere else

Edited June 1, 2012 by Libirica

[KissyFace 134]

Yes, because banning heterosexual marriage is such a perfectly INTELLIGENT and PEACEFUL way to stop the oppression of gay marriage.

 

Why can't we have more thinkers like this?

 

To be honest, I thought this topic was a joke at first.

[Zoro317 111]

That . . . just blew my mind :blink:

[FireRubies1 1,325]

I don't think this would help the community at all.... plus if we are immature about heterosexual marriage like some are about gay marriage.....stuff would just end up really not good o3o.

[shadowkiller 6]

i am a christian and i belive that being gay is wrong because God made man to be with woman it was adam and eve not adam and steve. so i would say no to gay marriages i dont hate gays or anything but i do belive its wrong

[Geralt 4,874]

i am a christian and i belive that being gay is wrong because God made man to be with woman it was adam and eve not adam and steve. so i would say no to gay marriages i dont hate gays or anything but i do belive its wrong

 

We all have a right to believe in what we want my friend

 

I don't think this would help the community at all.... plus if we are immature about heterosexual marriage like some are about gay marriage.....stuff would just end up really not good o3o.

 

Indeed :I

[TheApprenticeofKingMickey 3,689]

 

 

Why can't we have more thinkers like this?

 

To be honest, I thought this topic was a joke at first.

 

I was being sarcastic, brah.

 

Ahh whatever Never mind but Anyhow Love in my opinion is the most powerful thing ever and if they want to take it away well then hehe Lets all move to Canada or somewhere else

 

Dude, I am Canadian and that's insulting.

Edited June 1, 2012 by TheApprenticeofKingMickey

[KissyFace 134]

I was being sarcastic, brah.

 

 

 

Dude, I am Canadian and that's insulting.

 

I know you were being sarcastic. The very premise of this post is uh, nonsensical. I can see his argument, but in the end, it won't change anything, and even considering the idea is laughable.

[Xenidal 36]

Disagree.

For one thing, people in opposition to gay marriage are not attempting to control anyone's life. That's why typically they are in support of civil unions (which would allow a gay couple to live together for the rest of their lives with similar benefits to being married). One of the main issues is that people don't want to alter the definition of the word.

Edited June 1, 2012 by Xenidal

[Koko 3,944]

i am a christian and i belive that being gay is wrong because God made man to be with woman it was adam and eve not adam and steve. so i would say no to gay marriages i dont hate gays or anything but i do belive its wrong

 

no1curr

 

Disagree.

For one thing, people in opposition to gay marriage are not attempting to control anyone's life. That's why typically they are in support of civil unions (which would allow a gay couple to live together for the rest of their lives with similar benefits to being married). One of the main issues is that people don't want to alter the definition of the word.

 

By telling someone they don't deserve the same rights as everyone else (since people also oppose civil unions and just being homosexual in general), yes they are trying to control their lives, whether they know it or not.

The definition marriage shouldn't be the argument as to why not. I believe it is defined as between a man and a woman in the bible, but not everyone believes or reads the bible. Nothing should be based on religion because religion =/= politics.

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

I dont see how this would even BEGIN to help/solve the situation. If anything, it would aggravate it .

[Xenidal 36]

By telling someone they don't deserve the same rights as everyone else (since people also oppose civil unions and just being homosexual in general), yes they are trying to control their lives, whether they know it or not.

The definition marriage shouldn't be the argument as to why not. I believe it is defined as between a man and a woman in the bible, but not everyone believes or reads the bible. Nothing should be based on religion because religion =/= politics.

 

If all rights granted by a civil union were exactly the same as the rights given by marriage and the only difference was the word being used then it is not at all an issue of "telling someone they don't deserve the same rights as everyone else" or of controlling anyone's life. (And that's assuming that civil unions and marriages are equal, which I do not think they currently are but that's a whole separate issue...)

Yes, there are people who also oppose civil unions... but they are the minority and I'm not talking about those people.

 

One argument against gay marriage that I'm hearing is that it alters the definition of the word. I think that's a stupid reason for opposing it, but it is a reason nonetheless. By nature, languages can and will change over the course of time, not to mention that if you look up "marriage" in any new dictionary then "gay marriage" is already one of the definitions desipte the fact that gay marriage is not currently legal everywhere. And even though historically (even with the ancient Greeks who did not oppose homosexuality) marriage has always been between a man and a woman... there is little reason why such a trivial word cannot be changed.

 

Another argument I'm hearing is that allowing gay marriage will ruin the "sanctity" of marriage. However, I don't agree with that either... "marriage" itself is not sacred. "Matrimony" is sacred... as in, the rite performed through the religious institution is sacred. Since there is no current (common) push to force churches themselves to allow gay marriage, and it is all solely about the government's recognition of gay marriage then I don't see how the sacredness of it will be at all affected.

 

However, there are legitimate reasons to oppose gay marriage which do not involve bigotry.

Edited June 1, 2012 by Xenidal

[Koko 3,944]

If all rights granted by a civil union were exactly the same as the rights given by marriage and the only difference was the word being used then it is not at all an issue of "telling someone they don't deserve the same rights as everyone else" or of controlling anyone's life. (And that's assuming that civil unions and marriages are equal, which I do not think they currently are but that's a whole separate issue...)

Yes, there are people who also oppose civil unions... but they are the minority and I'm not talking about those people.

 

One argument against gay marriage that I'm hearing is that it alters the definition of the word. I think that's a stupid reason for opposing it, but it is a reason nonetheless. By nature, languages can and will change over the course of time, not to mention that if you look up "marriage" in any new dictionary then "gay marriage" is already one of the definitions desipte the fact that gay marriage is not currently legal everywhere. And even though historically (even with the ancient Greeks who did not oppose homosexuality) marriage has always been between a man and a woman... there is little reason why such a trivial word cannot be changed.

 

Another argument I'm hearing is that allowing gay marriage will ruin the "sanctity" of marriage. However, I don't agree with that either... "marriage" itself is not sacred. "Matrimony" is sacred... as in, the rite performed through the religious institution is sacred. Since there is no current (common) push to force churches themselves to allow gay marriage, and it is all solely about the government's recognition of gay marriage then I don't see how the sacredness of it will be at all affected.

 

However, there are legitimate reasons to oppose gay marriage which do not involve bigotry.

 

I agree with everything you've said actually.

 

Though, I do not believe there are any legitimate reason to not allow someone to marry whom they love.

The only I guess 'legitimate' reason (imo) would be religious, and even then, just because someone's religion says they can't, doesn't mean they should stop others, yknow?