Avoid the Moderators!

[Kingdom Key D 160]

I think we're back at -928, actually.

[TheWayToDawn 775]

-927(?)

[Kingdom Key D 160]

-926

Edited July 4, 2016 by Kingdom Key D

[MythrilMagician 6,963]

-937

Isn't it beautiful?

-1022 is the most beautiful number.

[Xiro 3,468]

-924

[Weedanort 8,786]

-923?

[Kingdom Key D 160]

-924

Sorry about the 30, though. I can't count in the summer.

[Felixx 6,646]

-925!

 

-1022 is so beautiful, we should make it the new start point

[Sendou Aichi 2,356]

Perhaps -1111?

[VisitJoan 2,713]

You know what?  When the count is negative, members should be able to reset to 0.

[Felixx 6,646]

Nah that would be boring

 

-926!

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

You know what?  When the count is negative, members should be able to reset to 0.

 

Nope. You don't get to change the rules that were established from the start. It's called Avoid the MODERATORS for a reason. Not avoid the members.

[Robbie the Wise 5,050]

Still not below 900? Lol...

You know what?  When the count is negative, members should be able to reset to 0.

Wouldn't that be a little unfair. There are a lot less mods then there are members. They have to work a lot harder to even get into the negatives. Edited July 4, 2016 by Robbie the Wise

[VisitJoan 2,713]

Nope. You don't get to change the rules that were established from the start. It's called Avoid the MODERATORS for a reason. Not avoid the members.

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.

Still not below 900? Lol...Wouldn't that be a little unfair. There are a lot less mods then there are members. They have to work a lot harder to even get into the negatives.

I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

[Aang 649]

-927 C:

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

 

The point went completely over your head. The idea is to avoid the MODS. Not members. Think about it lol. Secondly there are wayyyyyy more members that could easily help you count back than there are mods. By far. The numbers are in your favor so deal with it

[Robbie the Wise 5,050]

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

Because the members far outnumber the mods. If the members organize better it's a lot easier for them to amass numbers. The mods aren't always consistently active but their advantage is they coordinate a lot better. That's been the members problem from the get go. Plus you guys gave up pretty quickly and let them get this high.

[Felixx 6,646]

Whoa, chill. I was joking. No reason to go all mega authority on me.I'm in no way challenging the rules here, but since you mentioned it: It only requires two mods to get to the negatives regardless of what number we're on, but the members have been posting for five days and we're still nowhere zero. How does that not sound unfair?Now keep in mind that I'm not trying to change the rules here, I was only replying to what someone else said. Fair or not, I'm happy to play the games by the established rules.

 

This:

Because the members far outnumber the mods. If the members organize better it's a lot easier for them to amass numbers. The mods aren't always consistently active but their advantage is they coordinate a lot better. That's been the members problem from the get go. Plus you guys gave up pretty quickly and let them get this high.

 

There's no excuse to let the number go down below -1000 Especially since most of it was done by 2 mods. Would have been easy to prevent that, if the members were better organized.

[Trece the Xam ( ▀ ͜͞ʖ▀) 3,859]

Still not below 900? Lol...

 

Wouldn't that be a little unfair. There are a lot less mods then there are members. They have to work a lot harder to even get into the negatives.

[Robbie the Wise 5,050]

This: There's no excuse to let the number go down below -1000 Especially since most of it was done by 2 mods. Would have been easy to prevent that, if the members were better organized.

Exactly it was allowed to happen because everyone gave up.

[Trece the Xam ( ▀ ͜͞ʖ▀) 3,859]

0

[Felixx 6,646]

0

nice try

 

-926!

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

It wasn't just two mods but at times there were only two mods ...

 

 

0

-25252757365363733356353

 

Fixed

[Sendou Aichi 2,356]

Let's throw a party!

*eats cookies*

[Trece the Xam ( ▀ ͜͞ʖ▀) 3,859]

It wasn't just two mods but at times there were only two mods ...

 

 

 

Fixed

And one member All the other members were too lazy to help me