xemnas_is_#_1 1 Posted February 26, 2012 FUSION HA! POWER LEVEL IS OVER 9000!!!!!!!SRY I HAD TO Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xemnas_is_#_1 1 Posted February 26, 2012 in conclusion remake- stupid sequal-heck yea pokemon- lost there touch after saphire/ruby Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DragonMaster 1,166 Posted February 26, 2012 What i said on ur status is the same thing ill say here (let me find it first) The Blue/Red gem is not a gem. It is Ice. Blue is lightning, which is for Zekrom, and Red is fire, which is Reshiram. The Ice is Kyurem. =/ there not going back to Hoenn, which will be awesome if they do, but highly unlikely. They're gems. Even if it IS a remake, it doesn't matter. It's like Platinum. That was a remake of Diamond and Pearl, but was so much better. Did you complain about that game too? Besides, I'M looking forward to seeing N again. The reason they aren't on 3DS is because they are a sequel, and It's wouldn't be right. Gen 6 will most likely be on 3DS. Stop complaining, we all know you'll end up buying the game, loving it, and then feel stupid. Let's save you the feeling of stupid Meh, I really hope it is a sequel and not a remake. Platinum may have been better, but it just couldn't hold my interest. And yeah, people probably complained. Gen 6 on 3DS? Okay, how long will that take? If they make Ruby/Sapphire remakes (which they probably will), they better be released on the 3DS. There is no excuse. I am sure they could have made these games for the 3DS, and still able to trade with the original B&W. Yeah, people with only a DS couldn't play them. Here's the thing, Nintendo is a business, and they want to sell their new product. If anything could have sold the 3DS to people in every region, it is Pokemon. Think about what Monster Hunter has done for the 3DS in Japan, and apply it to all regions (though I am not sure that they would sell as well in each individual region). And yes, we will probably end up buying it and loving it, but that doesn't mean that we can't disagree with the console it is put on, nor does it mean we can deny that it would have been much better on the 3DS. 1 Kinode reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aqua7KH 5,395 Posted February 26, 2012 FUSION HA! I love you. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
J. Severe 1,137 Posted February 26, 2012 At first, I was a little ticked that this was for DS and not for 3DS, but now that I think of it, there is a possibility of 3DS enhanced features, like widescreen, connectivity with the 3DS's internet options, etc. The fact that there are two versions of this isn't really surprising, since they really seem to be pushing the "two versions" thing; "Pokemon the Movie White" and "Pokemon the Movie Black" proved that. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aqua7KH 5,395 Posted February 26, 2012 They are still remaking Ruby and Sapphire. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DragonMaster 1,166 Posted February 26, 2012 At first, I was a little ticked that this was for DS and not for 3DS, but now that I think of it, there is a possibility of 3DS enhanced features, like widescreen, connectivity with the 3DS's internet options, etc. The fact that there are two versions of this isn't really surprising, since they really seem to be pushing the "two versions" thing; "Pokemon the Movie White" and "Pokemon the Movie Black" proved that. The two versions thing is made more surprising due to the fact that there is normally two games to kick off the generation, then one enhanced version. This time it seems that instead of enhanced versions we are getting sequels, which is a first (not complaining, I think I like this better). But you are right about them really pushing the two separate version thing. If I am not mistaken, Black and White had the greatest difference between two versions than any of the others. I am upset, as it seems that when Reshiram (well Kyurem's Reshiram form) gets the cooler design, the legendaries switch games. Well, at least it seems that way because now the Zekrom is over the black logo and Reshiram is over the white logo. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Hazimie 1,595 Posted February 26, 2012 Black Kyurem and White Kyurem Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uncle Dolan 963 Posted February 26, 2012 *sigh* A sequel to the worst Pokemon games ever made yet. Gonna pass. 2 FireRubies1 and Keyblade King 12 reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
WakingDawn96 1,166 Posted February 26, 2012 My opinion on this whole thing: http://xeveemon.tumblr.com/ Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DragonMaster 1,166 Posted February 26, 2012 *sigh* A sequel to the worst Pokemon games ever made yet. Gonna pass. May I ask how this was the worst? It had the best battling, the best online features (just the best multiplayer aspect in general), better Pokemon than Gen IV introduced, made TMs better, lessened the need for HMs, had an actual plot, and introduced the closest thing to cutscenes in any main series Pokemon game. You are entitled to your opinion, but I am curious as to what makes it the worst in you eyes. My opinion on this whole thing: http://xeveemon.tumblr.com/ Pretty much, yeah. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uncle Dolan 963 Posted February 26, 2012 May I ask how this was the worst? It had the best battling, the best online features (just the best multiplayer aspect in general), better Pokemon than Gen IV introduced, made TMs better, lessened the need for HMs, had an actual plot, and introduced the closest thing to cutscenes in any main series Pokemon game. You are entitled to your opinion, but I am curious as to what makes it the worst in you eyes. Well, I'm not going to copy paste why because Skype sucks at copy-pasting. But, keep it general: 1. Pokemon 2. New Features 3. Random Difficulty Spikes 4. Story 5. Length Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Space Cowboy 1,392 Posted February 26, 2012 Interested in this game, but those fusions are ugly as SHIT. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Ace326 79 Posted February 26, 2012 All I have to say is that I feel like these games are just going to bs me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DragonMaster 1,166 Posted February 26, 2012 Well, I'm not going to copy paste why because Skype sucks at copy-pasting. But, keep it general: 1. Pokemon 2. New Features 3. Random Difficulty Spikes 4. Story 5. Length 1. Valid. Many of them were pretty bad. I still think D/P/Pt had worse though.2. ??? 3. I never noticed them, but valid. 4. ??? 5. Too long or too short? Either way, this one is purely up to the individual, so valid. Valid=an acceptable/legitimate reason/concern Interested in this game, but those fusions are ugly as SHIT. The Reshiram one looks okay, at least I kind of like it. The Zekrom one is pretty hideous though. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Uncle Dolan 963 Posted February 26, 2012 2. ??? 4. ??? 5. Too long or too short? Either way, this one is purely up to the individual, so valid. 2: The videocam thingy was really preformed awfully. So much lag and the audio quality is awful. 4: Pokemon games usually have interesting backstories and BW has little to none. 5: Too Short. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
DragonMaster 1,166 Posted February 26, 2012 2: The videocam thingy was really preformed awfully. So much lag and the audio quality is awful. 4: Pokemon games usually have interesting backstories and BW has little to none. 5: Too Short. 2. Agreed.4. It did lack backstory, but I enjoyed the games storyline. 5. Indeed. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Beta 102 Posted February 26, 2012 Pokemon is Pokemon. Either way, it's fan will love it, like it or not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weedanort 8,786 Posted February 26, 2012 I find Pokémon Black 2 and Pokémon White 2 interesting. They're doing something that they don't usually do. If you think about it, all previous gens had 1 sequel for each main series games (Yellow for Red, Blue and Green / Crystal for Gold and Silver / Emerald for Ruby and Saphire / Platinum for Diamond and Pearl), and this time around, we have 2 games. And they are probably doing what they did in the last gen. Platinum came first, then HeartGold and SoulSilver came later. So expect this game first, then the remakes of Ruby and Saphire. And I also find Kyurem's new forms actually menacing. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
khdude214 40 Posted February 26, 2012 Kyurem is originally a one standing pokemon. They were owned by 2 prince. The two twin princes argued with each other, and brought war on the land. Due to that, Kyurem split into two pokemon, Zekrom, the Pokemon of Ideals, and Reshiram, the Pokemon of Truth. So there must be a plot to this. Im pretty sure it wasnt kyurem wasnt the dragon bug zekrom and reshiram represent yin and yang kyurem represents the absence on yin and yang Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Weedanort 8,786 Posted February 26, 2012 Im pretty sure it wasnt kyurem wasnt the dragon bug zekrom and reshiram represent yin and yang kyurem represents the absence on yin and yang Then which dragon was it then? All evidences lead to Kyurem. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
King Riku 2,063 Posted February 26, 2012 Im pretty sure it wasnt kyurem wasnt the dragon bug zekrom and reshiram represent yin and yang kyurem represents the absence on yin and yang It's even been confirmed that it IS Kyurem. That's the whole plot of the 15th movie. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
khdude214 40 Posted February 26, 2012 Then which dragon was it then? All evidences lead to Kyurem. If u go to the town which is by giant chasm they tell legends about the dragons...and it was just some unnamed dragon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
AnsemTheWise 1,114 Posted February 26, 2012 Oh, so Kyurem's the original Dragon. This chizz makes more sense now. If it's a remake... screw it. I'm not replaying the whole game for a substory. If it's a proper sequel (or prequel, I guess), then not only would that be a first for the PKMN games, but I may be interested. EDIT: WTF Kyurem's already in Black and White! I forgot that's what it was! Interest: -15 points. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Shana09 5,769 Posted February 26, 2012 Oh, so Kyurem's the original Dragon. This chizz makes more sense now. If it's a remake... screw it. I'm not replaying the whole game for a substory. If it's a proper sequel (or prequel, I guess), then not only would that be a first for the PKMN games, but I may be interested. EDIT: WTF Kyurem's already in Black and White! I forgot that's what it was! Interest: -15 points. They said themselves they are not planning to make "Pokemon Gray/Grey" aka the remake of Black and White. This is a sequel meaning continuing a story plot line of the first Black and White. Yeah Kyurem was, but he wasn't there in the whole story line. He was just there as a secret boss/legendary. This time it seemed in the 2 versions he morphed with Zekrom/Reshiram for some reason. And now the main plot line of the story. How come you lost interest? So if he is in the original, barley in the plot, you should lose interest? Its a sequel. Making it continuing the plot. Sure I may see "-3-5" points off but "-15"? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites