gay marriage?

[Rizzyy 736]

  On 4/17/2012 at 8:04 AM, 'beadprincess' said:

No, I believe marriage should be between a man and a woman. I have nothing againist gays or lesbians. I treat them like everyone else. However, I believe they are living their lives in sin, because in the bible it clearly states that marriage should be between a man and a woman.

 

well see god/jesus didn't even write the bible it was men who thought up wat they thought gods will was and put on paper or wat ever they wrote way back then

[A mystery 346]

  On 4/19/2012 at 1:44 AM, 'FLASH45' said:

well see god/jesus didn't even write the bible it was men who thought up wat they thought gods will was and put on paper or wat ever they wrote way back then

 

  On 4/17/2012 at 11:09 PM, 'Goddess Koko' said:

I think that marriage between anyone should be allowed civil wise.

Marriage within the church depends solely on what the church itself decides to do

Some churches allow gay marriage because you know 'forgiveness for all, acceptance of all'

Others don't and that's fine too.

But marriage doesn't always have to do with religion and the bible

imo

since you know, you can get married in court and not necessarily with the church and i don't think religion should have anything to do with people getting married in court.

 

I will not disrespect any of your views, but could I please stop getting bashed over this.

[Koko 3,944]

  On 4/19/2012 at 2:41 AM, 'beadprincess' said:

I will not disrespect any of your views, but could I please stop getting bashed over this.

 

I am not disrespecting your views, I was just sharing what I thought.

I was in no way intending to bash you for your views.

[A mystery 346]

  On 4/19/2012 at 2:48 AM, 'Goddess Koko' said:

I am not disrespecting your views, I was just sharing what I thought.

I was in no way intending to bash you for your views.

 

I am sorry if it seemed like an over reaction, sometimes I tend to be sensitive. Thanks anyway for respecting my views too. Edited April 19, 2012 by beadprincess

[XIIISwords 1,059]

Personally, I believe that true love should always find a way.

 

But my high school government teacher made a very good argument against it in class today. He discussed how although he thinks like me, technically, a federal amendment declaring gay marriage legal in all states is actually unconstitutional. Nowhere in the constitution does it give the federal government that power, but it gives this power to the states. If each state individually made it legal on its own, then I guess this would work.

[TheApprenticeofKingMickey 3,689]

My honest opinion is go for it. I grew up believing that anybody of any gender having any sexuality was perfectly okay and normal. And the fact that we have so many sexualities in the human species shows how evolved we are. And I think that's pretty freaking awesome. I'm a huge supporter of same sex marriage and I think it should be allowed all over the world. Why shouldn't same sex couples be allowed to have their own happy ending? So yes. Yes to gay marriage.

Edited April 19, 2012 by TheApprenticeofKingMickey

[Think Pink 1,967]

  On 4/19/2012 at 1:44 AM, 'FLASH45' said:

well see god/jesus didn't even write the bible it was men who thought up wat they thought gods will was and put on paper or wat ever they wrote way back then

 

I felt like I had to point out that this is historically inaccurate. God influenced the hand of the writers of the Bible--it was a creation of God through mankind, not something people made up.

[dusk 910]

"I don't CAREEEEEE!"

Well I'm okay that people love who they love, so why couldn't they marry each other?

[Godot 513]

I really don't think "it goes against my religion" is a strong argument against gay marriage. America is secular--as a country, we are not officially tied to any religion. No church has the power to decide what is right and what is wrong, or what is allowed and what isn't.

 

Whether or not individual churches choose to marry gay couples is up to them; I'm Catholic, and, ideally, would want to get married in a Catholic church, but if I end up marrying a woman and my church doesn't allow that, I won't force them to, and I don't think it would be right to force them. idk if that makes any sense at all, but that's just my two cents.

 

and as for being gay is a sin: the Old Testament also said that 1) eating shellfish, 2) wearing clothes of mixed fibers, 3) interacting with a woman while she's on her period, 4) countless other things were also wrong. Make of that what you will.

[HarLea Quinn 26,501]

I am christian and i feel gay marriage is fine . Wouldnt God want gay people to commit to one person to love and raise a family with ?. ..Taking religion out of it altogether, i dont see why the government should have a problem with two people legally binding themselves together as a family . The right to marry the person you love should be a right for everyone .

[atheist123 583]

  On 4/19/2012 at 11:34 AM, 'Think Pink' said:

I felt like I had to point out that this is historically inaccurate. God influenced the hand of the writers of the Bible--it was a creation of God through mankind, not something people made up.

 

The very act of recording "truths" makes the "truths" untruthful. The Bible was written by men 2500-1800 ya approx.; fact. The Bible was translated from Hebrew or Greek (Old Testament/New Testament) into Greek (Old Testament) and Latin (for both) then eventually English; fact. There have been countless versions of the bible through time in Greek, Latin and English; fact. Was none of the translators ever tempted by, say, the devil to mis-translate? Were none of the Popes or Cardinals in the Dark Ages corrupt dictators? It is possible that the original Bible (which was penned by multiple authors across hundreds of years) could have been influenced by God's hand but not every single translator.

 

I'm not from America so I can't be the best person to make a judgement but from what I know, it's really complicated. You can't force states where the overwhelming majority of people oppose gay marriage to make it part of their law; the process needs to be democratic. And since each state is basically a country, it should be up to the state government not the federal(?) government to decide if gay marriage should be allowed. It's like if every state legalised medical marijuana; chaos would break out in some states but some states would be unaffected altogether. It's like making marriage illegal for straight people; if 99.9% of the population were gay (and the gay people weren't loving and accepting like most are) then it would be totally fair for them to outlaw straight marriage. Besides, if homosexuality was the main sexual orientation of humanity (but we still procreated out of neccesity) then the Bible would totally support gay marriage because all the corrupt cardinals etc would change God's divine message.

[Think Pink 1,967]

  On 4/20/2012 at 5:19 AM, 'atheist123' said:

The very act of recording "truths" makes the "truths" untruthful. The Bible was written by men 2500-1800 ya approx.; fact. The Bible was translated from Hebrew or Greek (Old Testament/New Testament) into Greek (Old Testament) and Latin (for both) then eventually English; fact. There have been countless versions of the bible through time in Greek, Latin and English; fact. Was none of the translators ever tempted by, say, the devil to mis-translate? Were none of the Popes or Cardinals in the Dark Ages corrupt dictators? It is possible that the original Bible (which was penned by multiple authors across hundreds of years) could have been influenced by God's hand but not every single translator.

 

I'm not from America so I can't be the best person to make a judgement but from what I know, it's really complicated. You can't force states where the overwhelming majority of people oppose gay marriage to make it part of their law; the process needs to be democratic. And since each state is basically a country, it should be up to the state government not the federal(?) government to decide if gay marriage should be allowed. It's like if every state legalised medical marijuana; chaos would break out in some states but some states would be unaffected altogether. It's like making marriage illegal for straight people; if 99.9% of the population were gay (and the gay people weren't loving and accepting like most are) then it would be totally fair for them to outlaw straight marriage. Besides, if homosexuality was the main sexual orientation of humanity (but we still procreated out of neccesity) then the Bible would totally support gay marriage because all the corrupt cardinals etc would change God's divine message.

 

The translations are correct, at the very least. When new Bibles are created and translated into English, the translators use the original works. Since they are the original works, they weren't tampered with over time.

 

I agree with part of what your second half is saying. Of course you can't force anyone to do anything--that's unfair. But in basically every state it will be passed, because so many people support it and the government runs the risk of being seen as infringing on their rights. It's going to be passed everywhere, despite any opposition.

[atheist123 583]

  On 4/20/2012 at 11:38 AM, 'Think Pink' said:

The translations are correct, at the very least. When new Bibles are created and translated into English, the translators use the original works. Since they are the original works, they weren't tampered with over time.

 

I agree with part of what your second half is saying. Of course you can't force anyone to do anything--that's unfair. But in basically every state it will be passed, because so many people support it and the government runs the risk of being seen as infringing on their rights. It's going to be passed everywhere, despite any opposition.

 

I can't be stuffed researching how bibles are actually made, so I'll just agree with you If you have faith that the Bible is 100% accurate then thats good enough for me, but as a scientist I take no theory as 100% correct, and no-one elses truth as 100% true.

[Captain Scrotum 53]

:"They think one of every 10 people are gay. So that means one of the twelve apostles might have been gay. My guess is Simon, cause that name's the gayest."

 

"The bible says it's an abomination for a man to lay down next to another man.. But we shared tents in Cub scouts and slept next to each other all the time.. so that would make cub scouts an abomination.."

 

"You know what else the bible says is an abomination? Eating lobster, planting different crops in the same field, giving somebody a 'proud look'? Not an abomination - slavery. Jesus never said anything about gay people, that's a fact."

 

"Well maybe he wanted to, but he didn't wanna hurt Simon's feelings.."

 

Yeah, that pretty much sums it all up for me. God bless Glee.

[Think Pink 1,967]

  On 4/20/2012 at 12:00 PM, 'atheist123' said:

I can't be stuffed researching how bibles are actually made, so I'll just agree with you If you have faith that the Bible is 100% accurate then thats good enough for me, but as a scientist I take no theory as 100% correct, and no-one elses truth as 100% true.

 

My old Bible class teacher used to work as a translator, that's the only reason I know. xDD Personally I only believe the Bible because of science. But we're sort of getting off-topic so I'll shut up. xDD

 

@topic

Did anybody participate in the Silent Stand thing today? I didn't, and I was so angry that kids at my school missed the point. I had two oral presentations today, and I can't shut up for more than 30 seconds anyway, and somehow that made all the kids doing it write on paper "YOU'RE BULLYING GAY KIDS BY TALKING TODAY". I think people missed the point. I wasn't going to kill my grades by skipping on doing a project :// I mean, just because someone doesn't participate doesn't mean they're bullies. That just set me off. I have plenty of gay friends and no problem with people who are, so how am I a bully? idk, that just really ticked me off. Did anybody else have trouble with kids missing the point today?

[Xer 670]

Know what? I dont give a firetruck about it, if a gay would like to marry who am I to get into it, for example, if my best friend is gay, so what? if he would do a marriage or ask me to be his bestman, ok, np...

So the guys who think That GAY MARRIAGE shouldnt be aloud, know what?

GO firetruck YOURSELF!

[Always 309]

Meh, I'm neutral on this issue, so I can't vote in the poll.