Anonymous and Lulzsec and Nato

[Vanitas 127]

http://www.metro.co.uk/tech/870018-lulzsec-and-anonymous-ponder-news-international-and-nato-leaks

 

What you guys think

[Sigrun 1,064]

well i think that what they're doing isnt funny or cute, they are playing with fire with really sensitive information that could compromise the security of NATO and international partners

[Amon 4,279]

Lulzsec is a disgrace to Anon.

[baylaust 2,531]

If these guys keep playing with fire, they're going to get burned, and badly.

[Amon 4,279]

Anonymous hacks for good reasons. They hack the websites of dictators, neo-nazi's, and other harmful groups. They do it to help set things right.

 

Lulzsec is the exact opposite. They hack the government websites of NATO and the EU as well as peaceful government groups not dedicated to anything harmful. What is more heinous is that they do it "for the lulz". Apparently international crisis and disorder is funny. Damn Anarchist.

[P50L 610]

Anonymous hacks for good reasons. They hack the websites of dictators, neo-nazi's, and other harmful groups. They do it to help set things right.

 

Lulzsec is the exact opposite. They hack the government websites of NATO and the EU as well as peaceful government groups not dedicated to anything harmful. What is more heinous is that they do it "for the lulz". Apparently international crisis and disorder is funny. Damn Anarchist.

 

So what your implying is

 

Anonymous hack for Good

But lulzsec hack for Evil?

 

All this time, we people who look down on anonymous have been blind and didn't even see what they were actually doing?!

[Amon 4,279]

So what your implying is

 

Anonymous hack for Good

But lulzsec hack for Evil?

 

All this time, we people who look down on anonymous have been blind and didn't even see what they were actually doing?!

 

Pretty much. The actual face of anon, is best seen at the following URL.

 

http://anonnews.org/?p=press&a=item&i=1001

 

The media likes to make anon look bad. They are pretty fair.

[P50L 610]

 

Pretty much. The actual face of anon, is best seen at the following URL.

 

http://anonnews.org/...s&a=item&i=1001

 

The media likes to make anon look bad. They are pretty fair.

 

Woah! I thought you guys hack and ruin people's lives, but your actually doing good....maybe they are the internet police? not sure how to put it....anyways you have changed my view towards anonymous

[Amon 4,279]

Woah! I thought you guys hack and ruin people's lives, but your actually doing good....maybe they are the internet police? not sure how to put it....anyways you have changed my view towards anonymous

 

Well I do not associate myself with anonymous. I'm a supporter, not a member. And they aren't really internet peace. More like a bunch of really bored people trying to make a difference.

 

There are many forms of anonymous. The anonymous that crashes websites and tries to cause trouble isn't the same as the anonymous that protest scientology and other harmful groups.

 

The main cause of all the confusion is that people just try to pull anonymous into what they are doing and use anonymous as a way to hide their agenda. Most anon members have no knowledge of hacking, and could care less what information the government is hiding.

[Lord Sesshomaru 35]

Sucks, that everyone who has been hacked has weak security.

[Vanitas 127]

Sucks, that everyone who has been hacked has weak security.

 

That means nato and the cia has weak security lol

[Lord Sesshomaru 35]

Prolly not as weak as PS3 though, they could be lying about it, but Sony had the easiest security system to be hacked.