superbanana 230 Posted July 16, 2011 Why can't you just like all the consoles? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
earth_angel 73 Posted July 16, 2011 If they make it for both Xbox and PS3, the quality of the PS3 version always suffers, in any multiplatform game, simply because the PS3 is more powerful but it's too expensive to make two completely different versions of the game. Other than that, it won't be a disaster if it gets released on Xbox, I have both. But as already said, it wouldn't feel right to have a numbered title on something other than the PS3. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amon 4,279 Posted July 18, 2011 If they make it for both Xbox and PS3, the quality of the PS3 version always suffers, in any multiplatform game, simply because the PS3 is more powerful but it's too expensive to make two completely different versions of the game. Other than that, it won't be a disaster if it gets released on Xbox, I have both. But as already said, it wouldn't feel right to have a numbered title on something other than the PS3. Not true. The Xbox is just as powerful as the PS3. The PS3 has the potential to be more powerful but the game design technology is not at the point where the PS3 can use it's spare power. In other words, the PS3 is ahead of it's time. The reason why multiplatform games are usually better on the Xbox is because microsoft pays the game companies to run more bug test on the Xbox version and what not. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
earth_angel 73 Posted July 18, 2011 Not true. The Xbox is just as powerful as the PS3. The PS3 has the potential to be more powerful but the game design technology is not at the point where the PS3 can use it's spare power. In other words, the PS3 is ahead of it's time. The reason why multiplatform games are usually better on the Xbox is because microsoft pays the game companies to run more bug test on the Xbox version and what not. You might have a point about the testing, doesn't make my point less true though. It is true that the PS3 games up till now haven't made full use of the PS3's possibilities, but then how do you explain the fact that on multiplatform games, the PS3 version always has better sound/graphics than the Xbox version? And yes, I have made comparisons using my own games and consoles. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xblade85 13 Posted July 18, 2011 no how mutch to get it refurbished Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
xblade85 13 Posted July 27, 2011 it wolud be cool if it's multiplayer not shure how that wolud work 1 rikunobodyxiii reacted to this Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
narutopins 11 Posted July 27, 2011 yeah im getting a xbox 360 because there online is better and it does not get firetrucking hack like ps3 other than that ps3 is better but im still getting it for xbox360 YAY!!!!!! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 5,571 Posted July 28, 2011 yeah im getting a xbox 360 because there online is better and it does not get firetrucking hack like ps3 other than that ps3 is better but im still getting it for xbox360 YAY!!!!!! if you agree LIKE THIS Yes, paying for online is so much better. Yeah, because until a few months ago you wouldn't have been talking about how the PS3 can be hacked. It happened once, and they have better protection than ever before now. Also, as long as you don't put your credit card info to buy stuff on PSN you are safe. But like I said, paying is so much better. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grimmjow 839 Posted July 29, 2011 WTF? I lol'd. ________________________ Not another console war GUYS! @hardware: PS3 has a better hardware but the improved performance is usedrarely... as example by Naughty Dog @Online: Xbox360: A few more options but expensive PS3: a bit less organized, for free.. @games: YOU PREFER THE CONSOLE WITH THE GAMES YOU PREFER GODDAMIT!! What's so hard to understand about that??? Ultimately you can screw the slight difference in hardware, online options ect. It is about the games: If you prefer Action-Adventures, God Of War, Jump n Run's, and most importantly Japano-Games.... you will get the PS3. If you prefer shooters like Gears Of War and Halo you will get the 360. Personally I prefer the PS3 because it's exclusives doesn't contain only shooters. Even though I am disappointed with the amount of quality-japano-roleplaying-games on the PS3 until now which were the reasons for me to buy the PS3. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grimmjow 839 Posted July 29, 2011 By the way: This debate was started by an estimated 10 year old who said: "I want KH3 (japano game) but I will buy a 360" So shame on all of us including me. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
rizar14 8 Posted July 31, 2011 Halo is such a gay and awesome game. PS3 FTW! wii u Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grimmjow 839 Posted July 31, 2011 wii u It's not even out yet and it was made 5 years after the PS3 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hatok 6,413 Posted July 31, 2011 It's not even out yet and it was made 5 years after the PS3 1- Why does that matter?2- Why does that matter? It not being out yet affects nothing, and I don't see what it being 'made 5 years after the PS3' (Nintendo didn't just make the system this year, it was in the works before the Wii was released) has to do with anything. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Grimmjow 839 Posted July 31, 2011 1- Why does that matter? 2- Why does that matter? It not being out yet affects nothing, and I don't see what it being 'made 5 years after the PS3' (Nintendo didn't just make the system this year, it was in the works before the Wii was released) has to do with anything. It's like comparing the iPhone5 with the Samsung Galaxy S II.... The Wii U is released way later which means it learned from the mistakes of the former consoles and has way better hardware. It also had more time to come up with innovative ideas.The Wii is half a generation further than the PS3 and 360.... time gave this console a major advantage (which wasn't used thaaat well) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Razorwind Keyblade 304 Posted July 31, 2011 Wii U does not deserve a game like Kingdom Hearts 3 on it! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hatok 6,413 Posted August 1, 2011 Wii U does not deserve a game like Kingdom Hearts 3 on it! Do consoles have inherent rights?Besides, what if KH3 sucks? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 5,571 Posted August 1, 2011 Do consoles have inherent rights? Besides, what if KH3 sucks? I suppose so, which is why we see sequels come out on the same console. You know KH3 won't suck. lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hatok 6,413 Posted August 1, 2011 I suppose so, which is why we see sequels come out on the same console. You know KH3 won't suck. lol It's the publishers that have games come out on the same consoles. You don't know that! Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 5,571 Posted August 1, 2011 It's the publishers that have games come out on the same consoles. You don't know that! Which is the same thing as to what i said. Did BBS, KH1, and KH2 suck? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hatok 6,413 Posted August 1, 2011 Which is the same thing as to what i said. Did BBS, KH1, and KH2 suck? It's not thr rigyht of the console, it's the right of the publisher. Consoles have no rights. Did Sonic 1, 2 and 3 suck? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 5,571 Posted August 1, 2011 It's not thr rigyht of the console, it's the right of the publisher. Consoles have no rights. Did Sonic 1, 2 and 3 suck? Which is the same thing as to what I said. Did Jak 1, 2, and 3 suck? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hatok 6,413 Posted August 1, 2011 Which is the same thing as to what I said. Did Jak 1, 2, and 3 suck? I'm confused Jak 1 was bland, Jak 2 was confusing, Jak 3 decent. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Rob 5,571 Posted August 1, 2011 I'm confused Jak 1 was bland, Jak 2 was confusing, Jak 3 decent. You are? It's all in opinion, which I'm sure many people wouldn't agree. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites