Shadowrider 1 Posted February 8, 2011 lol, I think it does. I take this as an example from my cousin. He is, I think, six or seven, and here is what he does. 1. Plays Grand Theft Auto to the Fullest extent. 2. Listen to people cuss all the time. 3. gets in a bunch of fights at school. And then there are a few things left unsaid, cause they are kinda, abnormal, for his age, and would surely show why I think yes. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxAs Is Wise 7 Posted February 8, 2011 Well, for those in realistic nature like GTA sure it's quite YES but for your example, I may agree with you, as long as it's not realistic it's okay. I'm not saying this like parents-like, but I've read that some brats really confessed that GTA made him did burglary. And for safety I think it's kinda ok for some violence-themed games being banned, not everyone is mentally-stable as we do, close-to-psychopath people do exist. The only way to prevent them from thinking anything bad is by them not knowing it, I suppose (or maybe at least that's what govs think) Also I chose second option and I'm not an idiot, I've stated my reason for saying that here. Someone should really change those words on that poll Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ObsidianEagle 103 Posted February 8, 2011 i think that for some games there should be just 3 ratings: - E (Everyone) - T (Teen) - T+ (equivilent of an 15 age rating) and obviously keeping the Ao rating for ''adult'' games it is a fact that the younger you are, the smaller the difference you see between real and fake. so age ratings to have to be put in for that, but i don't think a 12 year old boy would be scarred for life by playing something like bioshock. and i'm sorry about the poll, at the time i didn't think about the other side of the arguments, therefore nobody would say yes. i can't change the poll though, it won't let me Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
