Opinion: It's still way too early for cloud gaming to be viable

[SoraAlfheim 69]

What is Cloud gaming?

Cloud gaming, (not to be confused with subscription-based gaming), is the use of powerful centralized servers to render the game remotely rather than on the player's physical console and is currently being pushed by video game publishers as the new way to play video games.

The technology allows for things like better graphics, higher FPS-rates, better lighting, all with minimal hardware requirements for the client. You could play the most recent, most graphics heavy game at 4K 60fps from your two-year-old iPhone.

At least that's the idea. The problem is... It's still way too early for this to be technologically viable. And the recent release of the Kingdom Hearts Cloud versions prove it.

Square Enix and Nintendo decided to go against what most professionals have already said about cloud gaming, and published a cloud version the Kingdom Hearts series at nearly full price on a console designed to be used on the go with limited or no internet connection. Which is actually pretty disappointing as a fan of both the Kingdom Hearts series and Square Enix themselves.

The Problem

I think the best way to describe the problem is to compare it to traditional video streaming. When you watch a movie on Netflix, the movie is already rendered and ready to go on Netflix's servers, and will be downloaded in real time as you watch, with a few seconds of buffer to give you the most seamless experience.

What is a buffer?

In streaming, buffering means the platform gives itself a small head start. It starts downloading the content a few seconds (or less) before actually playing it. If the buffer runs out while watching, you might experience a short pause, a temporary drop in resolution, or both.

I think anyone that actively watched Youtube 10 years ago are all too familiar with this. As ISP's infrastructure gets better, the need for a buffer decreases, but it's still there in some capacity, and is likely to still be there for the foreseeable future.

However in cloud gaming, buffering isn't possible in any capacity. Since your console has to record your input, pass it on to the server, render the gameplay, then send it back to you all within a few milliseconds. There is no room for buffering, at all. Even just half a second of buffering means you'd be playing the game with a ping of 500ms. And I think most people would agree that isn't a great experience, especially when it comes to fast-paced games like Kingdom Hearts.

Credit: Screenshot taken from HMK's video about the same topic

Conclusion

If the Cloud game you're playing has servers within a hundred mile radius, and you have a good internet connection with low latency, you might be able to play it somewhat smoothly. But anyone outside of the most central parts in the most populated regions are out of luck.

If video game publishers keep pushing this technology too early, they risk taking huge hits to their image from their intended audience. I hope this outrage turns out to be a learning experience for Square Enix and for other publishers witnessing the outrage.

Maybe one day in the future, we'll have fast enough connections that most of the world will be able to experience and enjoy cloud gaming as it's intended, without having to live right next to the data center. But we're not quite there yet.

View full article

[ocean's rage 772]

i really dont like the idea of cloud gaming being the future. internet connections can be temperamental whenever they feel like it

[Kaweebo 3,617]

I disagree with with cloud gaming as a concept, especially for games that are inherently single player like Kingdom Hearts. You’re buying a game full price for what is essentially borrowing the right to stream what should be YOUR PRODUCT now. Like, owning your own video game means you can do whatever you want with your copy and can play it whenever you want forever without needing permission.
 

This push by companies to stream does not come off as a genuine enthusiasm for new technology, but simply a way for them to take money from you without actually having to give you anything. It’s a way for them to take control away from the consumer. No thank you. 

[pablo5425 7]

i dont think cloud gaming is ever going to replace digital/physic games

at least for the next 20 yrs

[pablo5425 7]

should be limited to an alternative if you cant run a game natively for whatever reason

[Vivian 0]

I personally don't think that cloud gaming will replace Physical or digital copies of games anything soon. The best we can do for now is hope that a better port is created for Switch. It deserves better. If this is the only way for someone to access kingdom Hearts currently though then I suggest they have some pretty great wifi for the best experience. 

[pablo5425 7]

technically you dont have them with digital games either
you get a license to use the game

[ocean's rage 772]

9 hours ago, pablo5425 said:

technically you dont have them with digital games either
you get a license to use the game

well there is a distinct difference what with the digital games actually being downloaded on to your device of choice rather than just being streamed to your device. not to mention digital only requires an internet connection for the initial download and not for the entire time youre playing the game. 

[pablo5425 7]

coughing gta 5

[ocean's rage 772]

1 hour ago, pablo5425 said:

coughing gta 5

what about it?

[pablo5425 7]

requires connection at least to boot it
unless you crack it

[ocean's rage 772]

3 hours ago, pablo5425 said:

requires connection at least to boot it
unless you crack it

doesnt sound like a digital game

[Inçendyne 31]

Might as well play a mobile game at that point