ConnahDC 5 Posted April 14, 2019 long message from ama inbound Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 His own trilogy can let him explore Star Wars lore separate from a trilogy,probably, where the story wouldn’t suddenly feel,what’s the term... discontinuous? Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ConnahDC 5 Posted April 14, 2019 :hobbS:brace for impactoh Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 seriously... the man doesn't know star wars.. lol Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 That makes me remember you said “firetruck LEGENDS” and I look it up, and it’s not Star Wars Academy Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 What’s the issue with Star Wars Legends? It’s just a new name brand Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ConnahDC 5 Posted April 14, 2019 hes making up a new part of the galaxynew charactersnew everytinggive him a chance Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 And not a lot of EU stories were that great.. they can be fun but.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 pretty sure i was saying "firetruck legends" because Revan is no longer canon and he is now considered a "legend"lolbut his writing was just.. B A D.. even if it's a new part of the galaxy.. it's just going to be a bad new part Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 ...?Um.. he’s references several times,Mup. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 Revan is technically no longer considered "canon"nor are any of the the old books Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 No.. he’s actually legitimately referenced several times in current canon Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 they are all considered "legends" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 And no.. Thrawn is canon, if you also watch RebelsThe guy literally shows upMup I don’t think you know what’s canon yourself now... Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 okay.. bits a pieces are picked from the books as canon.. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
2 quid is good 2,209 Posted April 14, 2019 Lol star wars sounds like hell Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 Honestly that’s way better than letting everything be canon from those books..Stares at Luke’s evil clone Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
ConnahDC 5 Posted April 14, 2019 the comics are firetrucking garbage"but muh canon"£firetruck your canon, disney is doing you all a favour Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 Ofc,Star Wars stories when they're great.. they're great,obviouslyLike Plageious,Thrawn,Revanetc,etc Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 like the Mandalorian war that REVAN FOUGHT IN was referenced in rebels.. but he was never fully mentioned.. so Revan is still TECHNICALLY a legend. he has never been directly referencedbut thrawn straight up was a main character in rebels thank godhe was awesome Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 See,that's the thing.. Legend doesn't mean "false" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mupstun2 11 Posted April 14, 2019 it doesn't mean true either Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amaterasu_1549906707 19 Posted April 14, 2019 Legend,by it's definition,means a "traditional story sometimes regarded as historical but unauthenticated" Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
