Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter
Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Recommended Posts

And as you said there's no true declaration on the matter so not everything can be said as 100 percent this is the truth. It frustrates when you have people who make it sound like these details are 100 percent canon and true to the story yet that has never been mentioned at all in the games. Nomura has added some details in the past so if he decides to do it with some other things that's great. But for me its not canon unless it serves a purpose in the games.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So if Nomura would add something or in an interview (or of the likes), because its not in the game, would you still consider it canon?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is the difference, the novels aren't written by Nomura. It's someone else. When Nomura says something in an interview, it's literally coming from him. Any stuff added in the novels are by the writer. The KH2 example you used earlier? That is something Nomura liked from the novel and added in, not something he thought of. If he didn't like it, it would not be considered canon to the original source as it wouldn't be in the game.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Ehhhhh I think we are detracting from the point at hand. I guess my choice of words led you to come to this kind of questioning. I think it is better to say that the issue is that the novels aren't something Nomura directly wrote himself. I am ok with things nomura has stated in interviews because if they are important enough I imagine they get added later and he also is the one writing the games

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...