Liraxus 4 Posted October 27, 2010 STOP firetruckING NECROPOSTIIIIINNNGGG Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Aaron 579 Posted October 27, 2010 Why. Whats wrong with it.. Unless its like, Happy Birthday for 5 years ago. Necroposting is fine. Don't complain:) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxasStalker 11 Posted October 27, 2010 I think it's funny when people start necroposting Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
CardCaptorDeadpool 386 Posted October 29, 2010 You're right its an almost futile attempt unless your the exception that gets overlooked or better yet contributes to the topic [mind you though 7 times outta 10 there usually is on topic contribution] Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
FireStorm 162 23 Posted October 30, 2010 ok, i'm gonna sound like a total noob here, but what's necroposting? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tom 437 Posted October 30, 2010 Dude, did you hear about that supercomputer that is now the fastest supercomputer in the world? Isn't that radical? /shotfornecropostingonpurpous Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amon 4,279 Posted November 19, 2010 Eh Necroposting bothers me for some reason. I just feel that if something is dead it should stay dead... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxSox 3,593 Posted November 20, 2010 I'd rather watch Necrophillia porn before I read necroposts. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Cyber Shaman 990 Posted November 20, 2010 Quote I'd rather watch Necrophillia porn before I read necroposts. nasty Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxAs Is Wise 7 Posted November 20, 2010 How about we let people make new thread for it, and forget there was already one ancients ago, so it won't be necropost (if the necropost is more than 1 year ago, I think the commenters will be completely different) Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxSox 3,593 Posted November 20, 2010 Quote How about we let people make new thread for it, and forget there was already one ancients ago, so it won't be necropost (if the necropost is more than 1 year ago, I think the commenters will be completely different) Against the rules to make a duplicate thread, so that wouldn't work. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxAs Is Wise 7 Posted November 20, 2010 The reason I said "we" is so we can change the rule. I mean, what's the harm in it? To repeat the fun old members had? Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Amon 4,279 Posted November 20, 2010 I think the rule could be changed so a duplicate thread can be created if the original thread has not received a post for 6 months. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxasStalker 11 Posted November 21, 2010 Quote I think the rule could be changed so a duplicate thread can be created if the original thread has not received a post for 6 months. I like this idea. Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxSox 3,593 Posted November 21, 2010 Quote I think the rule could be changed so a duplicate thread can be created if the original thread has not received a post for 6 months. I could go for that... Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
heartless101 83 Posted November 21, 2010 Quote I think the rule could be changed so a duplicate thread can be created if the original thread has not received a post for 6 months. That idea sounds pretty good to me Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
