keybladeblue6 72 Posted October 26, 2010 Ok so which way would be better if you were telling the story of Kingdom Hearts, would you go in chronological order meaning BBS,KH,COM,358/2,Kh2,and coded. Or would you go in the order Nomura released them KH,COM,358/2,KH2,coded, and finally BBS. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
MasterXemnas 2,285 Posted October 26, 2010 it seems btter by the way they release otherwise it goes too off track Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keyblader 325 Posted October 26, 2010 Yeah, I actually prefer it in the messed up order, adds mystery to it. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
hatok 6,413 Posted October 26, 2010 Order of release. Otherwise pretty much every mystery is explained before it actually happens. Roxas is explained, we know about Sora and Riku being keyblade wielders, etc. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
khven 0 Posted October 26, 2010 Ok so which way would be better if you were telling the story of Kingdom Hearts, would you go in chronological order meaning BBS,KH,COM,358/2,Kh2,and coded. Or would you go in the order Nomura released them KH,COM,358/2,KH2,coded, and finally BBS. im sure 358/2 was after kh2 Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Keyblader 325 Posted October 26, 2010 Ok so which way would be better if you were telling the story of Kingdom Hearts, would you go in chronological order meaning BBS,KH,COM,358/2,Kh2,and coded. Or would you go in the order Nomura released them KH,COM,358/2,KH2,coded, and finally BBS. im sure 358/2 was after kh2 Yeah, story line, it was before, but in terms of being made, it was after. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Tails 6,692 Posted October 26, 2010 I say the way the games are being released Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
oathkeeper89 17 Posted October 26, 2010 the way the games were released, if u do it chrono. peeps will think the main char. to be ven,aqua, and terra just too confusing especially if ur tryin to tell the story to someone who never played KH Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Lu Xun 2,069 Posted October 26, 2010 In the order of it Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
RoxasStalker 11 Posted October 26, 2010 The order that they were relesed just makes more sence that way Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Kinode 3,056 Posted October 26, 2010 Order of release. Why? Because thats the way its gotta be. The storyline might not make sense sometimes and themystery is no longer... mystery Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
KingdomHeartsFan2100 1 Posted October 27, 2010 Kh 2 came out before days Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
baylaust 2,531 Posted October 27, 2010 The way I see it, you can play KHI, CoM, Days, and II in chronological order (storyline). However, BBS should be played last, as it relies heavily on past knowledge of the games (ironically, since it's a prequel). Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Eterna 274 Posted October 27, 2010 I say like this: Kingdom hearts, COM, 358/2days, KH2, Birth by sleep, coded Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Sora96 17,256 Posted October 27, 2010 Kingdom Hearts Chain of Memories Kingdom Hearts II 358/2 Days Birth by Sleep Coded So yeah the order they were released in. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
Mog 97 Posted October 27, 2010 358 was 2009 , KH2 was 2005. Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites
roxas13heart 0 Posted October 30, 2010 Kh 1===>Kh CoM===>Kh 2===>Kh re: CoM===>Kh coded===>Kh 358/2 Days===>Kh BBS===> Kh re:coded (I found it in wikipedia ) Quote Share this post Link to post Share on other sites