Just a reminder that the first trailer still isn't canon.

[The 13th Kenpachi 4,279]

People keep using the scene where Sora picks up the Master Keeper as evidence to support their theories for 0.2 (*cough youtubers), but it's not canon and something that was thrown together at the last minute. 

 

http://www.khinsider.com/news/Kingdom-Hearts-III-Famitsu-Interview-Updated-The-Return-of-Meow-Wow-3350

 

Nomura: In this stage of testing he can transform it. By the way, in the trailer, Sora picks up the Keyblade belonging to Master Eraqus that Aqua had. We put that together in order to remind you of the story of KHIII, as this time we weren't able to prepare a scene that would show you a portion of the drama.

Edited December 10, 2016 by Barry Bacon Allen

[Felixx 6,646]

Well, technically it's possible that it is canon now Doubt it though.

[The 13th Kenpachi 4,279]

Well, technically it's possible that it is canon now Doubt it though.

If we see it again then yes otherwise

[KingdomHearts3 2,591]

People keep using the scene where Sora picks up the Master Keeper as evidence to support their theories for 0.2 (*cough youtubers), but it's not canon and something that was thrown together at the last minute. 

 

http://www.khinsider.com/news/Kingdom-Hearts-III-Famitsu-Interview-Updated-The-Return-of-Meow-Wow-3350

 

Nomura: In this stage of testing he can transform it. By the way, in the trailer, Sora picks up the Keyblade belonging to Master Eraqus that Aqua had. We put that together in order to remind you of the story of KHIII, as this time we weren't able to prepare a scene that would show you a portion of the drama.

Those Youtubers, always trying to make themselves right for instant gratification.

[Way2Dawn 80]

is this really that big of a deal?  its a shame that we rely so heavily on interviews and constantly needing confirmation from the developers instead of just simply using what we see and letting our imaginations run wild with our theories.

[The 13th Kenpachi 4,279]

is this really that big of a deal?  its a shame that we rely so heavily on interviews and constantly needing confirmation from the developers instead of just simply using what we see and letting our imaginations run wild with our theories.

Your theory can be whatever you want it to be , but if you want it to be accurate then I'd say you should do some research. If you don't want to do then you don't have to.

Edited December 10, 2016 by Barry Bacon Allen

[Headphone Jack 1,147]

knowing nomura he'll probably try to insert that scene into the final game, even if it takes place in a different location.

 

it's like the concept trailers Deep Dive and Birth By Sleep. those conceptual trailers found their way into the game. 

[Way2Dawn 80]

knowing nomura he'll probably try to insert that scene into the final game, even if it takes place in a different location.

 

it's like the concept trailers Deep Dive and Birth By Sleep. those conceptual trailers found their way into the game. 

exactly, we have no idea what hes planned.  People said not to read too much into the fact that Mickey is seen in his classic Disney attire at the end of KH1, but we can see in the newest 2.8 trailer that Nomura made it story relevant.  Lets just sit back and wait 

[Felixx 6,646]

exactly, we have no idea what hes planned.  People said not to read too much into the fact that Mickey is seen in his classic Disney attire at the end of KH1, but we can see in the newest 2.8 trailer that Nomura made it story relevant.  Lets just sit back and wait

 

Of course it is possible that that scene will happen. But it's just as possible that it won't, so using such scene to support a theory isn't valid.

That's what the OP meant with this thread.

[Isamu Kuno 2,512]

It's gonna get even worse now that we know Aqua visits Destiny Islands in the RoD. People are gonna start saying she lost or left the Masters Defender there and Sora took a detour back home before returning to Mysterious Tower and then that scene happens.

Edited December 10, 2016 by Isamu Kuno

[Way2Dawn 80]

Of course it is possible that that scene will happen. But it's just as possible that it won't, so using such scene to support a theory isn't valid.

That's what the OP meant with this thread.

actually I think you have it backward.  if there is any possibility then it makes any support in a theory valid until proven otherwise

[The 13th Kenpachi 4,279]

actually I think you have it backward. if there is any possibility then it makes any support in a theory valid until proven otherwise

How? The series director confirmed that the scene was put together to remind you of the story because they didn't have any substantial footage to show. The idea or theory that Aqua washed up on Destiny Islands is not valid because it has been proven otherwise by this interview.

Edited December 10, 2016 by Barry Bacon Allen

[Way2Dawn 80]

How? The series director confirmed that the scene was put together to remind you of the story because they didn't have any substantial footage to show.

that doesnt mean that it doesnt become substantial footage.  Im saying until we see that its not in the game then we cant say it isnt canon.  The whole story of X(chi) wasn't supposed to be made into a game (straight from Nomuras mouth) but we all know how that turned out.  Nothing is definitive which makes the use of this scene completely valid

[The 13th Kenpachi 4,279]

that doesnt mean that it doesnt become substantial footage.  Im saying until we see that its not in the game then we cant say it isnt canon.  The whole story of X(chi) wasn't supposed to be made into a game (straight from Nomuras mouth) but we all know how that turned out.  Nothing is definitive which makes the use of this scene completely valid

Why would it become substantial if it was just thrown together to remind you of the story? If I follow your train of thought then that means everything from every interview is false until we see it in the game or in a trailer.

[Felixx 6,646]

actually I think you have it backward. if there is any possibility then it makes any support in a theory valid until proven otherwise

But you can't use that to backup a theory. It's not a fact, just a possibility. Youtubers are using it as a fact though, as if it was 100% confirmed that it's canon.

Technically the whole scene with Sora picking up the Master's Defender would be a theory itself Since it wasn't confirmed to be canon. And using a theory to backup a theory is... not a good idea.

[Way2Dawn 80]

Why would it become substantial if it was just thrown together to remind you of the story? If I follow your train of thought then that means everything from every interview is false until we see it in the game or in a trailer.

Easy, Nomura could sit there and say "Hey, that was a good scene, lets use it".  Who cares if it was just thrown together?  That doesnt make it throw away material.  Things change.  0.2 was just supposed to be talked about, but Nomura decided that it needed to be told in a different way, because things change.  And no, Im not saying that everything from every interview is false until we see it.  Im saying dont see every interview as gospel, because none of us, and even sometimes Nomura, have no idea where this is going.  Again, see the creation of KHX, which perfectly proves my point

 

But you can't use that to backup a theory. It's not a fact, just a possibility. Youtubers are using it as a fact though, as if it was 100% confirmed that it's canon.

Technically the whole scene with Sora picking up the Master's Defender would be a theory itself Since it wasn't confirmed to be canon. And using a theory to backup a theory is... not a good idea.

Thats what Im saying, its possibility, im not claiming that its fact.  Its a possibility that Sora isnt one of the 7 lights, that doesnt mean you cannot theorize either way

[Felixx 6,646]

Easy, Nomura could sit there and say "Hey, that was a good scene, lets use it".  Who cares if it was just thrown together?  That doesnt make it throw away material.  Things change.  0.2 was just supposed to be talked about, but Nomura decided that it needed to be told in a different way, because things change.  And no, Im not saying that everything from every interview is false until we see it.  Im saying dont see every interview as gospel, because none of us, and even sometimes Nomura, have no idea where this is going.  Again, see the creation of KHX, which perfectly proves my point

 

 

Thats what Im saying, its possibility, im not claiming that its fact.  Its a possibility that Sora isnt one of the 7 lights, that doesnt mean you cannot theorize either way

Never said you are But most of the people who use it for their theories claim it's a fact. That's what I meant.

[Way2Dawn 80]

Never said you are But most of the people who use it for their theories claim it's a fact. That's what I meant.

ok yea I definitely dont agree with that

[BlankShell 638]

I keep losing the source of this quote, thanks for bringing it up.

 

I mean, it's always possible they found a way to connect it, but we'll see...

[The 13th Kenpachi 4,279]

I keep losing the source of this quote, thanks for bringing it up.

 

I mean, it's always possible they found a way to connect it, but we'll see...

Yeah it's difficult to keep finding the same things over but if you just find articles and click ctrl F you can look for keywords. Also you can just google the keywords like 'tetsuya nomura kh3 release window decided' or something.