Web
Analytics Made Easy - StatCounter
Jump to content
  • Sign Up

Compilation of Kingdom Hearts 3D reviews


DChiuch

With Kingdom Hearts 3D [Dream Drop Distance] already released in Europe, and releasing in North America on July 31, 2012, many publications and websites have already published their official review of Kingdom Hearts 3D. Since there are so many, we won't create a new article for each review-- instead, we'll link to them all here! These interviews combined have given Kingdom Hearts 3D a Metacritic score of 76, and a Game Rankings score of 81.92%, which is quite impressive. Also, keep an eye out, since KH13's official review of the game will be ready in about a week! Until then, here's a list of other reviews:

90/100 from Cubed3
80/100 from Eurogamer
81/100 from Family Friendly Gaming
83/100 from Game Informer
82/100 from GameTrailers
70/100 from games(TM)
90/100 from G4tv
85/100 from IGN
71/100 from Meristation
70/100 from Nintendo Life
84/100 from Official Nintendo Magazine UK
72/100 from Nintendo Gamer
80/100 from 3DJuegos
85/100 from 4Players.de
70/100 from Gamespot

Sign in to follow this  


User Feedback

Recommended Comments



But bashing a game isn't a good review. A proper review consists of both appreciation AND critiscm, not just one or the other. That's why it's understandable that NO game really can have a 100/100 review. Every good point about the game was followed by at least a few more bad ones. Every paragraph stated negative facts. Why include a review that has been so poorly written? I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts. It's as if this person put an image in their mind of KH3D being horrible, then played it, and then regarded it as horrible anyway. This person obviously does have an opinion, but that's an opinion, not a review. n opinion cannot be portrayed as a full, proper review.I'm just saying that this review isn't even a proper review and therefore should not be included.

 

Actually

http://www.pushsquar...rakes_deception

 

It got a 100/100

Edited by Shana09

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

But bashing a game isn't a good review. A proper review consists of both appreciation AND critiscm, not just one or the other. That's why it's understandable that NO game really can have a 100/100 review. Every good point about the game was followed by at least a few more bad ones. Every paragraph stated negative facts. Why include a review that has been so poorly written? I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts. It's as if this person put an image in their mind of KH3D being horrible, then played it, and then regarded it as horrible anyway. This person obviously does have an opinion, but that's an opinion, not a review. n opinion cannot be portrayed as a full, proper review.I'm just saying that this review isn't even a proper review and therefore should not be included.

 

Criticizing=/=bashing. That's all that needs to be said based on your wall of text. He simply didn't like the game. Why can't you just accept that not everyone will like a game?

 

EDIT: Well, I guess criticism is sort of bashing x3

 

But my point still stands.

Edited by KissyFace

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Criticizing=/=bashing. That's all that needs to be said based on your wall of text. He simply didn't like the game. Why can't you just accept that not everyone will like a game?

 

EDIT: Well, I guess criticism is sort of bashing x3

 

But my point still stands.

 

I think a review is supposed to be fair, we all know that a 40 is not understandable for this game, also that guy said everything is bad, which isn't and I am not going biased, but it is not bad enough to give it a 40.

Atleast a 60+

Edited by Shana09

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think a review is supposed to be fair, we all know that a 40 is not understandable for this game, also that guy said everything is bad, which isn't and I am not going biased, but it is not bad enough to give it a 40.

Atleast a 60+

 

To be fair, have you actually played the game yet? Also, he didn't say that everything is bad, but bad review or not, it still should be on this list, not just putting up the good/decent review scores.

 

That being said, his score was overly harsh based on his criticisms.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts."

^in case you skipped this.

Like Shana09 said, his review could've scored bad, but as low as 40/100 is absolutely ridiculous. Simply because he personally didn't like the game. Then he shouldve just posted that as an opinion, not a full review if it was only opinion, not actual attempt at observation.

 

 

 

 

To be fair, have you actually played the game yet? Also, he didn't say that everything is bad, but bad review or not, it still should be on this list, not just putting up the good/decent review scores.

 

That being said, his score was overly harsh based on his criticisms.

 

What we're saying is though, is that his review doesn't fulfill requirements of a proper review, as it is merely his own opinion. All he could applause was the graphics, nothing else. He pretty much did say everything is bad. Every paragraph was negatively written with full criticism. For all the good points he stated, he also attempted to support with a few reasons as to why the good point should be knocked over and forgotten.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I understand that not everyone is a fan of this game series, but that doesn't mean people who hate the series should write a biased review based on solely their own thoughts."

^in case you skipped this.

Like Shana09 said, his review could've scored bad, but as low as 40/100 is absolutely ridiculous. Simply because he personally didn't like the game. Then he shouldve just posted that as an opinion, not a full review if it was only opinion, not actual attempt at observation.

 

 

 

What we're saying is though, is that his review doesn't fulfill requirements of a proper review, as it is merely his own opinion. All he could applause was the graphics, nothing else. He pretty much did say everything is bad. Every paragraph was negatively written with full criticism. For all the good points he stated, he also attempted to support with a few reasons as to why the good point should be knocked over and forgotten.

 

It covered story, gameplay, and new features. That basically proves your point invalid. It had more then enough to be considered a proper review. Also, maybe he really didn't like the gameplay? But that aside, the gameplay section really didn't have much criticism, rendering that point invalid as well.

 

Just accept that some will not like a game, even if most people do.

 

EDIT: And the thought that someone should write a review as an opinion because it is negative is completely ridiculous. Expunge that thought from your head right now.

Edited by KissyFace

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

It covered story, gameplay, and new features. That basically proves your point invalid. It had more then enough to be considered a proper review. Also, maybe he really didn't like the gameplay? But that aside, the gameplay section really didn't have much criticism, rendering that point invalid as well.

 

Just accept that some will not like a game, even if most people do.

 

EDIT: And the thought that someone should write a review as an opinion because it is negative is completely ridiculous. Expunge that thought from your head right now.

 

Again, I said that I understand that not everyone is a fan of KH, in case you missed that point again. I never said that a negative review couldn't be written, I stated that even with good or bad points, 40/100 is ridiculous. Even just above that could be reasonable, but to say this game is a failure? That's crossing the line. And anyone's opinion could include all different facts of the game such as graphics and gameplay. But a professional reviewer doesn't only criticize a game, and they most certainly don't put games as 40% often. A 50-60 is understandable for someone who really didn't like it. But to have a few good points and accompany that with a 40? No. Just no.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, I said that I understand that not everyone is a fan of KH, in case you missed that point again. I never said that a negative review couldn't be written, I stated that even with good or bad points, 40/100 is ridiculous. Even just above that could be reasonable, but to say this game is a failure? That's crossing the line. And anyone's opinion could include all different facts of the game such as graphics and gameplay. But a professional reviewer doesn't only criticize a game, and they most certainly don't put games as 40% often. A 50-60 is understandable for someone who really didn't like it. But to have a few good points and accompany that with a 40? No. Just no.

 

I don't miss points. My point is not everyone will like a game and rate it high. The fact that you're still arguing with me about it shows me that you're the one missing the point here. The AV Club gave Uncharted 3 a 50%. It's just some people's opinions, whether or you agree or not, and their review should be on the list.

 

LightningXIII, it ends here. Just let it go.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't miss points. My point is not everyone will like a game and rate it high. The fact that you're still arguing with me about it shows me that you're the one missing the point here. The AV Club gave Uncharted 3 a 50%. It's just some people's opinions, whether or you agree or not, and their review should be on the list.

 

LightningXIII, it ends here. Just let it go.

 

If you want to argue about the list thing, then do it with DC.

He is the one who made it >>

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

If you want to argue about the list thing, then do it with DC.

He is the one who made it >>

 

I already quoted him, he didn't reply.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah it is included in the MetaCritic thing.

 

It boosted the game score up by one point. It's now a 77.

 

my bad :P and wow 1 point xD

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

my bad :P and wow 1 point xD

 

xDDDD

I wish it increases into the 80's, that be nice.

Even though I haven't played it yet, I think it should be around the same score as BBS.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

xDDDD

I wish it increases into the 80's, that be nice.

Even though I haven't played it yet, I think it should be around the same score as BBS.

 

yea i saw the score of BBS on the MetaCritic and was like wow KH3D needs to be up here too

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites

yea i saw the score of BBS on the MetaCritic and was like wow KH3D needs to be up here too

 

Only 13 critics reviewed KH3D.

BBS got 62 critics.

Lets wait for a week after the NA KH3D release for the final average score.

Share this comment


Link to comment
Share on other sites



Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Add a comment...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...

×
×
  • Create New...