WTF IGN?!
#21
Posted 27 February 2012 - 07:56 PM
#22
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:02 PM
And the fact that he refers to BBS and KH3D as "spin-offs", and that KH and KH2 are the only "real" games makes me question how much he knows about the games and the storyline at all. It's his opinion, and I respect that, but he could have at least tried to make himself sound like he had some sense in him.
#23
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:11 PM
Like people have said before, this is an opinion we are talking about people. This one guy's views doesn't represent all of IGN, or what Kingdom Hearts is for that matter. How do I feel about what he said? I have points where I agree with him, and points where I don't. Yes, there are things that could be different about Kingdom Hearts, things that would make it better.
Atlantica in KH2 is (In my opinion of course) the worst and most annoying world in the entire series so far. I thank the team for making it a non-plot important world, a smart move on their part, considering that if I'm not in the mood for getting Orichalcum+ (I at least think there was one), a Blizzard upgrade, and the Keyblade for that world (Don't remember the name), then I don't have to. I also agree with what he said about "We pray for our sorrows to end, and hope that our hearts will blend. Now I will step forward to realize this wish." because honestly I don't understand it either, at all. Does it make his opinion (and mine as well) right for everyone else? Not at all. Are there things in this article that I don't agree with? Of course. I'm not sure I'm fully hooked on the Toy Story world idea, though as I think about it, it probably could make a good world.
All in all, it's just an opinion, and there's no need to make death wishes against this guy. Sure, there are times when I feel strongly about something...Now that I think about it, that's the case here. But nonetheless, it doesn't mean it has to turn into a blood bath.
I tried to understand what the article was saying. I really did. But, to me, he just sounded like one of those guys who criticize the entire series and just wants KH3, only with correct spelling, grammar, and that he can publish his thoughts on one of the more popular video gaming sites out there.
And the fact that he refers to BBS and KH3D as "spin-offs", and that KH and KH2 are the only "real" games makes me question how much he knows about the games and the storyline at all. It's his opinion, and I respect that, but he could have at least tried to make himself sound like he had some sense in him.
Yeah, he probably could have changed what he said about it to seem like so much less of, well, a full force argument. I can't say I'd know how to word it better, but still.
He has an.... OPINION?!?!
BLAARRGGNBRUEOJ;NF EALJFNARFJUOA BHFBRFGNJHKBFHEWBNFLHRB UJREFKA HE MUST DIE A PAINFUL DEATH!!!!!!!!1!!!!11!11!
I know right?
#24
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:23 PM
With that said, I think the writer only looked at the bad side of the game, seriously I can write a better article than him.
In the end, a hater is a hater and we move on.
#25
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:27 PM
#26
Posted 27 February 2012 - 08:59 PM
#27
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:03 PM
The guy has some valid points, and he did defend them well (I still don't necessarily agree with all of them, though). That Disney is too restrictive is true (did anyone honestly enjoy KHII Atlantica to the extent that you want to see it again, did anyone enjoy it to any extent?). Multi-console release for KHIII (and had remakes of the PS2 titles, if you don't mind my adding) would be amazing. A normal name for KHIII is pretty much a given, though I do side with him that they shouldn't give it a fancy name. Plus, he praised the gameplay through-out the article.
That said, he just presented his opinion in such an antagonistic way, that I can't respect him. The title was pure troll bait, and is only going to cause a flame war between fans, fanboys, and haters.
I disagree wholeheartedly. With very few exceptions, I am entirely motivated to play a game for its story. No story = no buy. My exceptions are as follows: Fighters, Puzzle games, and "mini-games". Kingdom Hearts is really the only game I continue to play long after I beat the story, simply because they are fun. Pokemon sometimes too.By the way, I don't think that videogames should be played for its story, That's why they are video-games. It's like trying to play hide and seek with some plot. Some videogames have nice stories, but they could end up being an interactvie movie rather than a videogames
#28
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:08 PM
#29
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:18 PM
#30
Posted 27 February 2012 - 09:55 PM
Let me begin; I disagree with his examination of Roxas and Ventus. Roxas was a very different character from Sora and showed off a more personal and less openly heroic side to a protagonist. His quiet and thoughtful care was something that contrasted brilliantly with Sora's sometimes over-zealousness to create a character that I was thrilled to be able to play as, and his friendship with Axel was a spectacular look at character development and human connections that I think were the very best in the series. Ventus I think showed a bit more of an outward personality, but also held onto a lot of the inward, thoughtful traits of Roxas, a combination of Sora and Roxas that developed in an amazing way alongside Aqua and Terra.
#31
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:15 PM
#32
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:17 PM
And stop and think about it, there are only three characters in KH: Sora, Kairi, and Xehanort. Everybody else is a variation of them.
Part of being a fan is understanding what you're a fan of. Just blindly ignoring any flaws doesn't make you a fan. It makes you something lesser than that.
No, they just found Buzz and Woody models. We don't know why it doesn't appear, but all it really implied was they might be summonsThis guy didn't know what he was talking about. It's Pride LANDS not pride ROCK. Toy Story was gonna be in KH2, but it was taken out due to time constraints, they went to Kingdom Hearts in KH2, and the fact that the story is SO complex is one of the best parts of Kingdom Hearts as a series. He had one good point: CUT IT OUT WITH THE FIRETRUCKING SORA CLONES! 4 Sora's is enough!
Because games came out later, and suddenly the plot got more complicated. The series could have ended with KH2 with a few changes.Then, may I ask why do you want KH3? If KH2 had a real ending, then, why to make KH3? There's no storyline to follow.
#33
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:18 PM
#34
Posted 27 February 2012 - 10:28 PM

It would be nice if he got a few things straight. As was pointed out earlier, we've been to the Pride LANDS, and the entire final beattle sequence took place inside Kingdom Hearts. Hell, the final battle in KH1 was just outside the door! And the Secret Episode in BbSFM took place in the Realm of Darkness... right behind the door!!!!
It's pretty clear that he just swooped in, chose some things that he wanted to pick at. and loaded his gun. Sure, he pointed out some of the good features (the combat system, etc), but that's really only because otherwis eth earticle would have gone beyond a flame; it would've been a bonfire!
Sorry, Jack DeVries, but I'm afraid I need to put an arrow in your knee.
#35
Posted 28 February 2012 - 09:20 AM
And give him a good helping of FUS RO DAHhttp://30.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lxoo5c...
It would be nice if he got a few things straight. As was pointed out earlier, we've been to the Pride LANDS, and the entire final beattle sequence took place inside Kingdom Hearts. Hell, the final battle in KH1 was just outside the door! And the Secret Episode in BbSFM took place in the Realm of Darkness... right behind the door!!!!
It's pretty clear that he just swooped in, chose some things that he wanted to pick at. and loaded his gun. Sure, he pointed out some of the good features (the combat system, etc), but that's really only because otherwis eth earticle would have gone beyond a flame; it would've been a bonfire!
Sorry, Jack DeVries, but I'm afraid I need to put an arrow in your knee.
#36
Posted 28 February 2012 - 04:31 PM
Agreed.And give him a good helping of FUS RO DAH
Like so many people before me have said, he has some valid points, but overall I think he just got confused by a small bit of KH and then got annoyed at his own confusion. He has an opinion so here is mine: I wanna punch this guy in the face.
#37
Posted 28 February 2012 - 05:31 PM
If those overreacting are at one extreme, then this I would consider the other. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and that should be respected. However, there are good ways to state opinions, and bad ways. Writing an article and titling it "Kingdom Hearts Sucks" is the wrong way to do it, even if the contents of the article are fine and dandy. Taking that same article, and naming "Kingdom Hearts, How to fix it" would be a good way to express opinion. The fact is that if you say something sucks, you are going to anger someone who likes whatever the heck it is. Just pulling a random thing from your "About Me" page, how would you like it if I wrote an article titled "Persona Sucks"? I might make some good points, but by saying that something you like sucks, I automatically bias you against me.It's threads like these that make me glad I'm not involved in this fandom anymore. It's an article about someone's opinion. Get over it.
Basically whats happening here is as follows:
Extreme fans are calling for this guy to be lynched because he insulted their favorite series. Normal fans are respecting that it is his opinion, saying that there is something they can understand and find agreeable, but expressing dislike of his blatant troll-bait title. Haters are yelling about how the series is terrible and blah, blah, blah all the usual. The people whose only interest in the series seems to be whining for KHIII are doing just that. Then there are those (who can fit into any of these categories, except extreme-fan or fanboy if you prefer) getting all worked up and overreacting due to the overreactions of others. Yeah, its just an opinion, and yeah lots of people are overreacting. But I'll let you in on a secret, you're not going to convince those overreacting otherwise, so all your really doing is adding to the complaints.
Oh, and this wasn't targeted to you in particular DemyxLovesCookies, your post was just the closest one from the quick reply box.
#38
Posted 28 February 2012 - 07:06 PM
If those overreacting are at one extreme, then this I would consider the other. Everyone is entitled to an opinion, and that should be respected. However, there are good ways to state opinions, and bad ways. Writing an article and titling it "Kingdom Hearts Sucks" is the wrong way to do it, even if the contents of the article are fine and dandy. Taking that same article, and naming "Kingdom Hearts, How to fix it" would be a good way to express opinion. The fact is that if you say something sucks, you are going to anger someone who likes whatever the heck it is. Just pulling a random thing from your "About Me" page, how would you like it if I wrote an article titled "Persona Sucks"? I might make some good points, but by saying that something you like sucks, I automatically bias you against me.
Basically whats happening here is as follows:
Extreme fans are calling for this guy to be lynched because he insulted their favorite series. Normal fans are respecting that it is his opinion, saying that there is something they can understand and find agreeable, but expressing dislike of his blatant troll-bait title. Haters are yelling about how the series is terrible and blah, blah, blah all the usual. The people whose only interest in the series seems to be whining for KHIII are doing just that. Then there are those (who can fit into any of these categories, except extreme-fan or fanboy if you prefer) getting all worked up and overreacting due to the overreactions of others. Yeah, its just an opinion, and yeah lots of people are overreacting. But I'll let you in on a secret, you're not going to convince those overreacting otherwise, so all your really doing is adding to the complaints.
Oh, and this wasn't targeted to you in particular DemyxLovesCookies, your post was just the closest one from the quick reply box.
I'll admit that my post was a bit too blunt, and I did overreact, so I apologize.
The title of an article doesn't change its contents. If you wrote an article entitled "Persona Sucks", and it's content made sense and brought up some fair points, I wouldn't mind the title at all, even if it was blatant flame-bait. YMMV, though.
#39
Posted 28 February 2012 - 08:50 PM
#40
Posted 28 February 2012 - 08:53 PM















Daniel Chiuchiarelli