76 replies to this topic

[Razorwind Keyblade]

It's not that it won't sell, it's that Square won't profit very much if they don't put it on the right console. What is it people are having so much trouble grasping? All anybody says is 'It sells' and tries to snidely imply that I don't know what I'm talking about, or that they know something I don't. The PS3 has the weakest sales of this console generation. It's kind of turned around since then, but it's still very weak. Sony made a tonne of mistakes with its initial release, while Nintendo basically copied what worked fro Sony with the PS2.
PS3 games cost a tonne to make. Developers need to make money off their investment. That reminds me. Why do you think Square is making so many non-KH3 games? To screw over the fans? It's to draw in as many fans, and create as much hype for KH3 as possible. They NEED the game to sell because it's going to cost an absolute fortune to make, if they want to meet fan expectations anyways. That's why the games go to so many different consoles, by the way, not to 'force' fans to buy new consoles, but to get to as big of an audience as possible.
Now, if KH3 uses tech that can only be used on the PS3 (Like Versus XIII) then it'll go there, but now the Wii U is more powerful than the PS3, so that possibility is gone. Listen, I'm not even saying that it WON'T be on the PS3, but if it were to be released tomorrow, it would not make sense to release it on the PS3.
If you guys disagree with me, make a legitimate argument. I'm not being presented with any evidence, indeed, I'm not being presented with anything but





Notw ho NONE of you made any effort to explain your opinion, instead presenting it as fact.

One last thing. 3D is on the 3DS because 3D will make use of its features. Maybe it needs a touchscreen, or AR cards, or glassesless 3D, or spot pass, or street pass. Games aren't put on consoles on a whim, and it certainly would not make sense to put 3D on the PS3. The logic that it would make Square more money doesn't even hold up, especially when you consider that square had reason to believe that the 3DS would do as well as the DS.

LOL and we don't have to.

[hatok]

Truly yours is an enlightened opinion.

[Razorwind Keyblade]

Truly yours is an enlightened opinion.

lol you always have to be right don't you?

[hatok]

lol you always have to be right don't you?

Sort of, I guess.
I really wouldn't care so much if you guys at least attempted to make a defense. It really bugs me when people don't. A One of my quirks I suppose.

[Razorwind Keyblade]

Sort of, I guess.
I really wouldn't care so much if you guys at least attempted to make a defense. It really bugs me when people don't. A One of my quirks I suppose.

Hmmm, you even admit it. Not what I expected.

Anyway, people don't feel like making extremley long posts like you just to proove a point.

[Ace326]

Lol Nintendo never copied Sony. True it would be sort of dumb to put 3D on PS3, but they most likely thought about it. Also you are right about the features thing. It gives Square more interesting features to work with, but graphics is probably what bothered them.

[hatok]

Lol Nintendo never copied Sony. True it would be sort of dumb to put 3D on PS3, but they most likely thought about it. Also you are right about the features thing. It gives Square more interesting features to work with, but graphics is probably what bothered them.

I didn't mean copy quite that literally. I'm basically saying that Nintendo basically did what Sony did with the PS2, having a low cost, low power system with lots of support, and it worked. That said, Nintendo did copy Sony's dual analog stick.
It's not a big deal, companies copy eachother like crazy.

Hmmm, you even admit it. Not what I expected.

Anyway, people don't feel like making extremley long posts like you just to proove a point.

It doesn't need to be long. Like I said, any effort. But there's no effort here. Your short, lol-encrusted posts have next to no value, simply iterating an opinion as fact without so much as a hint as to WHY

[Razorwind Keyblade]

I didn't mean copy quite that literally. I'm basically saying that Nintendo basically did what Sony did with the PS2, having a low cost, low power system with lots of support, and it worked. That said, Nintendo did copy Sony's dual analog stick.
It's not a big deal, companies copy eachother like crazy.

It doesn't need to be long. Like I said, any effort. But there's no effort here. Your short, lol-encrusted posts have next to no value, simply iterating an opinion as fact without so much as a hint as to WHY

If I wanted to proove my facts were right then I would be doing that right now. I'm not intrested in arguing with someone like you that thinks they know everything (KH-Related).

[hatok]

If I wanted to proove my facts were right then I would be doing that right now. I'm not intrested in arguing with someone like you that thinks they know everything (KH-Related).

That's the point I'm trying to make. As far as I'm concerned, I'm right. You say I'm wrong, but won't say why. If you could actually say something, anything, to the contrary, I would be willing to hear it, and if you could prove otherwise I would concede. But you won't even try. I'm not going to try and pretend I know everything about anything. I doubt even Tetsuya Nomura knows EVERYTHING about KH. The point is, I'm presenting my information, and am being told I'm wrong in spite of it, yet nothing has been done to back up this.
You want my personal guess? You have no evidence to back up what your saying, s you're trying to use this elusive mannerism to shrug that off without backing down on your own opinion. I honestly can't fathom why, because only a minute ago you were accusing ME of wanting to always be right. It's a matter of right until proven wrong in this case, and I see no proof.

[Ace326]

Im pretty sure Nintendo decided to do two anolog sticks without taking into concideration Sony. Nintendo didnt copy any of those ideas it was just ideal to do it.

[Rob]

Hmmm, you even admit it. Not what I expected.

Anyway, people don't feel like making extremley long posts like you just to proove a point.

Very true. KH3 on PS3, it will sell. lol long story short.

[hatok]

Very true. KH3 on PS3, it will sell. lol long story short.

Why?

[Rob]

Why?

Read my posts and you'll find the gold.

[hatok]

Read my posts and you'll find the gold.

Not interested in gold, I want reasons.

[Rob]

Not interested in gold, I want reasons.

You just answered yourself.

@Razorwind

I hope the recent news has confirmed your thoughts about KH3D not being KH3, even though it was way way before.

[Mickey-D]

they wouldn't put kh3 on a handheld when kh1 & kh2 have been on ps2, they'd be more likely to put it on the more powerful consoles like ps3 or xbox360 (more likely to on ps3 though)

[hatok]

they wouldn't put kh3 on a handheld when kh1 & kh2 have been on ps2, they'd be more likely to put it on the more powerful consoles like ps3 or xbox360 (more likely to on ps3 though)

Or the Wii U or the Vita?
Square will put it on whatever console will work best at the time.