• Log in with Twitter Log In with Google
  •    Sign In   
  • Create Account

You are viewing the forum as a guest. For a better experience, please sign in or create an account.

Forum Search New Content Forum Rules Boards Status Updates Fan-made Images Fan-made Videos Livestreams Chatroom
Photo

Fire Emblem vs. Capcom


  • Please log in to reply
4 replies to this topic

#1 Perkilator

Perkilator

    R.I.P Luigi. He never got to try Peach's spaghetti.

  • Member
  • 692 posts

Posted 11 March 2018 - 03:40 PM

I know this is a bit out of left field, but does anyone want a Fire Emblem vs. Capcom?

For whatever reason, Nintendo vs. Capcom just seems too generic for me.

Edited by lollygagger19, 11 March 2018 - 03:42 PM.


#2 kingdombladesventus

kingdombladesventus
  • Member
  • 170 posts

Posted 11 March 2018 - 09:49 PM

The better question, which physics/game mechanics would win. I'll root for Fire Emblem, but Capcom has characters that can easily beat them and their respecitive weapons. If it was the Tales of Series vs. Capcom, then The Tales Series would win for sure with their artes and magic artes. Opps, I forgot why I mentioned that. It's one thing FE could beat them with magic, but their magic is limited, unlike the Tales of Series. Distinctive, but unless sword users are the roster, or a ROBIN, then it should be balanced.


Edited by kingdombladesventus, 11 March 2018 - 09:50 PM.


#3 TheFVguy

TheFVguy
  • Member
  • 24 posts

Posted 14 March 2018 - 08:49 PM

Why not Nintendo VS Capcom? I'm not a Fire Emblem, so to me that game would be pretty disappointed and I would ask "Why couldn't they just do Nintendo vs Capcom?". Sure, the Fire Emblem would be happy, but honestly, it would be a pretty dumb decision to just do the FE franchise when you could put in many more franchises in order for it to sell more.



#4 Perkilator

Perkilator

    R.I.P Luigi. He never got to try Peach's spaghetti.

  • Member
  • 692 posts

Posted 14 March 2018 - 11:17 PM

Why not Nintendo VS Capcom? I'm not a Fire Emblem, so to me that game would be pretty disappointed and I would ask "Why couldn't they just do Nintendo vs Capcom?". Sure, the Fire Emblem would be happy, but honestly, it would be a pretty dumb decision to just do the FE franchise when you could put in many more franchises in order for it to sell more.

Becuase Nintendo vs. Capcom would be such a generic choice for a crossover. We’ve got Smash Bros. for it, anyways (then again, we also have it for Fire Emblem vs. Capcom). Plus, Fire Emblem has just as expansive for options for a roster as all of Capcom.

#5 TheFVguy

TheFVguy
  • Member
  • 24 posts

Posted 16 March 2018 - 05:29 PM

Becuase Nintendo vs. Capcom would be such a generic choice for a crossover. We’ve got Smash Bros. for it, anyways (then again, we also have it for Fire Emblem vs. Capcom). Plus, Fire Emblem has just as expansive for options for a roster as all of Capcom.

That goes to almost all franchises when it comes roster options. I understand we have Smash, but when I think of Nintendo VS Capcom, I think of tournament fighter, such as Street Fighter and Darkstalkers. I would really love for Nintendo characters to be in these kinds of games, it would incredibly fun.


Edited by TheFVguy, 16 March 2018 - 05:29 PM.